Literature DB >> 19364227

The contribution of spatial cues to memory: direction, but not cue, changes support response reversal learning.

Sandra L Wright1, Dene Williams, John H Evans, Darlene M Skinner, Gerard M Martin.   

Abstract

In four experiments, rats were trained on a response problem followed by three reversals. Rats that changed rooms between acquisition and reversals learned the reversals in fewer trials than rats that remained in the same room, even when distal visual cues were limited. Changes in orientation, even in the same room, also facilitated response reversal learning. The advantage observed with changes in orientation across reversals does not appear to be due to differences in local views or to different start positions. Direction changes, but not cue changes, may support response reversal learning by taking advantage of the natural interaction between responses and direction when one map is used. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19364227     DOI: 10.1037/a0013405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  2 in total

Review 1.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation.

Authors:  James J Knierim; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Distance and direction, but not light cues, support response reversal learning.

Authors:  S L Wright; G M Martin; C M Thorpe; K Haley; D M Skinner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.