Literature DB >> 19363529

Interactive diagnostics in the indication to allogeneic SCT in AML.

U Bacher1, C Haferlach, S Schnittger, W Kern, N Kroeger, A R Zander, T Haferlach.   

Abstract

Owing to the heterogeneity of AML, the indication for allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT) requires an exact definition of the individual subentity and risk category. A comprehensive diagnostic approach is needed, which combines cytomorphology, cytogenetics, FISH, molecular genetics and immunophenotyping. Whereas the categorization in three prognostic karyotype groups is well established, rare recurrent aberrations as the unfavorable t(8;16)(p11;p13), inv(3)(q21q26) and t(6;9)(p23;q34) must also be considered. In normal karyotype, PCR analyses reveal prognostically relevant mutations in >85% of cases, and a molecular data set composed of the FLT3-ITD, MLL-PTD, NPM1 and CEBPA mutations was found able to guide the selection of patients for allo-SCT. Some novel markers as the WT1 mutations might further contribute to risk stratification in normal karyotype. The panel of minimal residual disease parameters is being expanded at this time, for example, by quantitative PCR for the NPM1 mutations. Immunophenotyping allows the definition of leukemia-associated phenotypes in nearly all cases, but its position in the indication to allo-SCT has to be validated. Thus, the optimization of the indication to allo-SCT is an ongoing process that should remain in continuous interaction with the increasing panel of known genetic markers and diagnostic methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363529     DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  4 in total

1.  Reduced late mortality risk contributes to similar survival after double-unit cord blood transplantation compared with related and unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Doris M Ponce; Junting Zheng; Anne Marie Gonzales; Marissa Lubin; Glenn Heller; Hugo Castro-Malaspina; Sergio Giralt; Katharine Hsu; Ann A Jakubowski; Robert R Jenq; Guenther Koehne; Esperanza B Papadopoulos; Miguel A Perales; Marcel R van den Brink; James W Young; Farid Boulad; Nancy A Kernan; Rachel Kobos; Susan Prockop; Andromachi Scaradavou; Trudy Small; Richard J O'Reilly; Juliet N Barker
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Thomas C Shea; Yuri Fedoriw
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Lentivirus-induced dendritic cells for immunization against high-risk WT1(+) acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Bala Sai Sundarasetty; Vijay Kumar Singh; Gustavo Salguero; Robert Geffers; Mareike Rickmann; Laura Macke; Sylvia Borchers; Constanca Figueiredo; Axel Schambach; Urban Gullberg; Elena Provasi; Chiara Bonini; Arnold Ganser; Thomas Woelfel; Renata Stripecke
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.695

4.  Influence of molecular subgroups on outcome of acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype in 141 patients undergoing salvage allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary induction failure or beyond first relapse.

Authors:  Tim Pfeiffer; Michael Schleuning; Jiri Mayer; Karl-Heinz Haude; Johanna Tischer; Stefanie Buchholz; Donald Bunjes; Gesine Bug; Ernst Holler; Ralf G Meyer; Hildegard Greinix; Christof Scheid; Maximilian Christopeit; Susanne Schnittger; Jan Braess; Günter Schlimok; Karsten Spiekermann; Arnold Ganser; Hans-Jochem Kolb; Christoph Schmid
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 9.941

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.