Literature DB >> 19363347

Ultrasound usage in the head and neck surgeon's office.

Hans-J Welkoborsky1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the essential developments in neck sonography published in the past 12 months and to elucidate their influence on the indications and diagnostic accuracy of office-based ultrasonography. RECENT
FINDINGS: In the screening of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, sonographic and duplex sonographic characteristics have been described to identify lymph node metastases, that is, size, shape, echogenicity, homogeneity, absence of hilar sign and hilar vessel, surface irregularity, necrotic areas, evidence of extracapsular spread, peripheral perfusion pattern, focal vascularization defects, and high pulsatility index. The combination of conventional ultrasound, duplex sonography, and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies (USgFNAB) achieves an overall accuracy of nearly 100%. Ultrasound has been found to be most accurate in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of thyroid and parathyroid disorders, the localization of parathyroid adenomas and the differential diagnosis of thyroid gland disorder. Sonographic characteristics, however, are mostly unspecific. Sonography provides the chance to obtain cytologic material under direct view by USgFNAB.
SUMMARY: Office-based ultrasonography is a simple and rewarding technique that is enhanced by the experience of the investigator. The neck surgeon who is caring for the patient might use this information for diagnostic and therapeutic management. Due to high accuracy, noninvasiveness, and lack of radiation exposure, ultrasonography is required in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of any pathologic masses in the entire neck and prior to any surgical procedure. Future developments, that is, elastography, might lead to further improvement in the diagnostic accuracy to differentiate benign and malignant masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363347     DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283297042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  7 in total

1.  [Sonographic differential diagnosis of cervical masses].

Authors:  P Jecker
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Evaluation and development of a predictive model for ultrasound-guided investigation of neck metastases.

Authors:  Jens Eduard Meyer; Armin Steffen; Martin Bienemann; Juergen Hedderich; Ulrike Schulz; Martin Laudien; Joachim Quetz; Barbara Wollenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Clinical utility and prospective comparison of ultrasonography and computed tomography imaging in staging of neck metastases in head and neck squamous cell cancer in an Indian setup.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashraf; Jaydip Biswas; Jayesh Jha; Sandeep Nayak; Vikas Singh; Suparna Majumdar; Anup Bhowmick; Aniruddha Dam
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of conventional B-scan, tissue harmonic imaging, compound imaging and tissue harmonic compound imaging in neck lesion characterisation.

Authors:  Alessandro Bozzato; Anne Loika; Joachim Hornung; Michael Koch; Johannes Zenk; Wolfgang Uter; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Ultrasound backscatter microscopy for imaging of oral carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew Lam; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Yang Sun; Feifei Zhou; Allison Dobbie; Regina F Gandour-Edwards; Steve P Tinling; D Gregory Farwell; Wayne L Monsky; K Kirk Shung; Laura Marcu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  In vivo validation of a bimodal technique combining time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy and ultrasonic backscatter microscopy for diagnosis of oral carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Hongtao Xie; Jing Liu; Matthew Lam; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Feifei Zhou; Julien Bec; Diego R Yankelevich; Allison Dobbie; Steven L Tinling; Regina F Gandour-Edwards; Wayne L Monsky; D Gregory Farwell; Laura Marcu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  [Perfusion analysis in parotid gland tumors using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)].

Authors:  Maria Agnes Albers; Julian Küstermeyer; Hans-Jürgen Welkoborsky
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 1.284

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.