Literature DB >> 1936331

Direct intraperitoneal insemination--clinical results and comparison between two methods of sperm preparation.

P O Karlström1, O Bakos, M Palmstierna, T Bergh, O Lundkvist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare sperm preparation with a new self-migration method in sodium hyaluronate and a centrifugation/swim-up method and to study the efficiency of direct intraperitoneal (IP) insemination. STUDY
DESIGN: Sodium hyaluronate and centrifugation/swim-up were used randomly for direct IP insemination in alternating cycles. Treatments were given with an interval of at least one untreated cycle. When ovulation occurred on weekends, the patients received only controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. SETTINGS: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. PATIENTS: Seventy-nine couples with unexplained infertility (n = 53), endometriosis (n = 17), and cervical factor (n = 9).
INTERVENTIONS: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was accomplished by clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sperm parameters and pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: Sodium hyaluronate and centrifugation/swim-up resulted in similar conception rates, but sodium hyaluronate recovered more motile spermatozoa than centrifugation/swim-up (P less than 0.0001). The number of patients who became pregnant after direct IP insemination or controlled ovarian hyperstimulation only was significantly higher than that observed after untreated cycles (P = 0.00001 and P = 0.008, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Sperm preparation with sodium hyaluronate can be used as an alternative to centrifugation/swim-up. Direct IP insemination appears to increase the cycle fecundity, but whether direct IP insemination/controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is more effective than controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone has yet to be proven.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1936331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  2 in total

1.  An open multicenter study to compare the efficacy of intraperitoneal insemination and intrauterine insemination following multiple follicular development as treatment for unexplained infertility.

Authors:  S Ajossa; G B Melis; A Cianci; M E Coccia; A M Fulghesu; G Giuffrida; S Guerriero; A Lanzone; G Francoscarselli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Direct intraperitoneal insemination and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in subfertile couples.

Authors:  K Ben Rhouma; E Ben Miled; A Ben Marzouk; M Rihani; M Bakir
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.412

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.