Literature DB >> 19363143

Profiling the reproductive toxicity of chemicals from multigeneration studies in the toxicity reference database.

Matthew T Martin1, Elizabeth Mendez, Daniel G Corum, Richard S Judson, Robert J Kavlock, Daniel M Rotroff, David J Dix.   

Abstract

Multigeneration reproduction studies are used to characterize parental and offspring systemic toxicity, as well as reproductive toxicity of pesticides, industrial chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Results from 329 multigeneration studies on 316 chemicals have been digitized into standardized and structured toxicity data within the Toxicity Reference Database (ToxRefDB). An initial assessment of data quality and consistency was performed prior to profiling these environmental chemicals based on reproductive toxicity and associated toxicity endpoints. The pattern of toxicity across 75 effects for all 316 chemicals provided sets of chemicals with similar in vivo toxicity for future predictive modeling. Comparative analysis across the 329 studies identified chemicals with sensitive reproductive effects, based on comparisons to chronic and subchronic toxicity studies, as did the cross-generational comparisons within the multigeneration study. The general pattern of toxicity across all chemicals and the more focused comparative analyses identified 19 parental, offspring and reproductive effects with a high enough incidence to serve as targets for predictive modeling that will eventually serve as a chemical prioritization tool spanning reproductive toxicities. These toxicity endpoints included specific reproductive performance indices, male and female reproductive organ pathologies, offspring viability, growth and maturation, and parental systemic toxicities. Capturing this reproductive toxicity data in ToxRefDB supports ongoing retrospective analyses, test guideline revisions, and computational toxicology research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363143     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

1.  Toxic environmental chemicals: the role of reproductive health professionals in preventing harmful exposures.

Authors:  Patrice Sutton; Tracey J Woodruff; Joanne Perron; Naomi Stotland; Jeanne A Conry; Mark D Miller; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Progress in data interoperability to support computational toxicology and chemical safety evaluation.

Authors:  Sean Watford; Stephen Edwards; Michelle Angrish; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  In silico prediction of the developmental toxicity of diverse organic chemicals in rodents for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Shikha Gupta; Kunwar P Singh
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 4.  Models of germ cell development and their application for toxicity studies.

Authors:  Daniel W Ferreira; Patrick Allard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  THE INTERACTIVE DECISION COMMITTEE FOR CHEMICAL TOXICITY ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Hao Zhu; Fred A Wright; Fei Zou; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Stat Res       Date:  2012

6.  The Next Generation Blueprint of Computational Toxicology at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; Tina Bahadori; Timothy J Buckley; John Cowden; Chad Deisenroth; Kathie L Dionisio; Jeffrey B Frithsen; Christopher M Grulke; Maureen R Gwinn; Joshua A Harrill; Mark Higuchi; Keith A Houck; Michael F Hughes; E Sidney Hunter; Kristin K Isaacs; Richard S Judson; Thomas B Knudsen; Jason C Lambert; Monica Linnenbrink; Todd M Martin; Seth R Newton; Stephanie Padilla; Grace Patlewicz; Katie Paul-Friedman; Katherine A Phillips; Ann M Richard; Reeder Sams; Timothy J Shafer; R Woodrow Setzer; Imran Shah; Jane E Simmons; Steven O Simmons; Amar Singh; Jon R Sobus; Mark Strynar; Adam Swank; Rogelio Tornero-Valez; Elin M Ulrich; Daniel L Villeneuve; John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Antony J Williams
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Suspect Screening Analysis of Chemicals in Consumer Products.

Authors:  Katherine A Phillips; Alice Yau; Kristin A Favela; Kristin K Isaacs; Andrew McEachran; Christopher Grulke; Ann M Richard; Antony J Williams; Jon R Sobus; Russell S Thomas; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Variability in in vivo studies: Defining the upper limit of performance for predictions of systemic effect levels.

Authors:  Ly Ly Pham; Sean Watford; Prachi Pradeep; Matthew T Martin; Russell Thomas; Richard Judson; R Woodrow Setzer; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2020-08-01

Review 9.  Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: focus on the cancer hallmark of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Zhiwei Hu; Samira A Brooks; Valérian Dormoy; Chia-Wen Hsu; Hsue-Yin Hsu; Liang-Tzung Lin; Thierry Massfelder; W Kimryn Rathmell; Menghang Xia; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Dustin G Brown; Kalan R Prudhomme; Annamaria Colacci; Roslida A Hamid; Chiara Mondello; Jayadev Raju; Elizabeth P Ryan; Jordan Woodrick; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Rabindra Roy; Stefano Forte; Lorenzo Memeo; Hosni K Salem; Leroy Lowe; Lasse Jensen; William H Bisson; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the ToxCast project.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas B Knudsen; Matthew T Martin; Holly M Mortensen; David M Reif; Daniel M Rotroff; Imran Shah; Ann M Richard; David J Dix
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.