Literature DB >> 19362587

Evaluation of the accuracy of antioxidant competition assays: incorrect assumptions with major impact.

Jiska M Balk1, Aalt Bast, Guido R M M Haenen.   

Abstract

The activity of antioxidants is frequently determined in competition assays. In these assays an antioxidant (A) and a detector molecule (D) compete for the reactive species (R). The competitive inhibitory effect of A on the reaction of D with R is a measure of the antioxidant activity of A. In determining the activity of A, it is in general incorrectly assumed that the concentrations of A and D remain equal to the initial concentration. However, the principle of the assay is that some A and D is consumed and consequently the concentrations of A and D will decrease during a competition assay, resulting in a deviation in the observed antioxidant activity. Computer modeling was used to obtain a graphical tool to estimate the extent of the deviation caused by the incorrect assumption that the concentrations of A and D do not decrease. Several competition assays were evaluated using this graphical tool, demonstrating that frequently inaccurate antioxidant activities have been reported. In general, differences between antioxidants are underestimated and the activity of all antioxidants shifts toward the antioxidant activity of D. A strategy is provided to improve the accuracy of a competition assay. To obtain accurate results in a competition assay, the reaction rate constant of the detector molecule with the reactive species should be comparable to that of the antioxidant. In addition, the concentration of the reactive species should be as low as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362587     DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med        ISSN: 0891-5849            Impact factor:   7.376


  3 in total

1.  Assay dilution factors confound measures of total antioxidant capacity in polyphenol-rich juices.

Authors:  Bradley W Bolling; Ya-Yen Chen; Alison G Kamil; C-Y Oliver Chen
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Glutathione revisited: a better scavenger than previously thought.

Authors:  Guido R M M Haenen; Aalt Bast
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  A Kinetic Approach in the Evaluation of Radical-Scavenging Efficiency of Sinapic Acid and Its Derivatives.

Authors:  Neda Nićiforović; Tomaž Polak; Damjan Makuc; Nataša Poklar Ulrih; Helena Abramovič
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.