Literature DB >> 19362341

Recurrence at three months and high-grade recurrence as prognostic factor of progression in multivariate analysis of T1G2 bladder tumors.

Juan Palou1, Federico Rodríguez-Rubio, Félix Millán, Ferran Algaba, Oscar Rodríguez-Faba, Jorge Huguet, Humberto Villavicencio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk factors for disease progression in the frequent subgroup of Stage T1G2 (World Health Organization 1973) bladder tumors using an analysis of a large cohort of patients with Stage T1G2 disease.
METHODS: A cohort of 616 patients with Stage T1G2 were treated with transurethral resection and random bladder biopsies. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done using Cox regression analysis. The independent variables were multiplicity, association with carcinoma in situ (CIS), tumor size, tumor recurrence at 3 or 6 months, tumor grade, and association with CIS at first recurrence. The dependent variable was progression to muscle-invasive disease.
RESULTS: Progression to muscle-invasive disease was identified in 28 of the 616 patients (4.5%). On multivariate analysis, when considering recurrence at 3 months, this factor was the principal prognostic factor, with a relative risk of 4.0 (95% confidence interval 1.2-13.3), followed by the presence of high-grade disease or CIS at first recurrence (relative risk 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.8) and CIS associated with the primary tumor (relative risk 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.9). When considering recurrence at 6 months, more prognostic factors were involved for progression, including as multiple tumors, CIS associated with the primary tumor, recurrence at 6 months, and the presence of high-grade disease or CIS at the first recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: In primary urothelial T1G2 bladder cancer, recurrence at 3 months was the main prognostic factor related to progression. Additional factors were the association of CIS with the primary tumor and the presence of high-grade disease and/or CIS at first recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362341     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [Aftercare of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer].

Authors:  G B Schulz; B Schlenker; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The value of EORTC risk tables in evaluating recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in everyday practice.

Authors:  Rafał Walczak; Krzysztof Bar; Janusz Walczak
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-01-27

4.  Real-time bladder lesion registration and navigation: a phantom study.

Authors:  Michelle Agenant; Herke-Jan Noordmans; Wim Koomen; J L H Ruud Bosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Usefulness of pT1 substaging in papillary urothelial bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Carlo Patriarca; Rodolfo Hurle; Marco Moschini; Massimo Freschi; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Maurizio Colecchia; Lucia Ferrari; Giorgio Guazzoni; Andrea Conti; Giario Conti; Roberta Lucianò; Tiziana Magnani; Renzo Colombo
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.644

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.