Literature DB >> 19362037

Reason, emotion and decision-making: risk and reward computation with feeling.

Steven R Quartz1.   

Abstract

Many models of judgment and decision-making posit distinct cognitive and emotional contributions to decision-making under uncertainty. Cognitive processes typically involve exact computations according to a cost-benefit calculus, whereas emotional processes typically involve approximate, heuristic processes that deliver rapid evaluations without mental effort. However, it remains largely unknown what specific parameters of uncertain decision the brain encodes, the extent to which these parameters correspond to various decision-making frameworks, and their correspondence to emotional and rational processes. Here, I review research suggesting that emotional processes encode in a precise quantitative manner the basic parameters of financial decision theory, indicating a reorientation of emotional and cognitive contributions to risky choice.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362037     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  23 in total

1.  Neural processing of risk.

Authors:  Peter N C Mohr; Guido Biele; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Brain gray matter deficits at 33-year follow-up in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder established in childhood.

Authors:  Erika Proal; Philip T Reiss; Rachel G Klein; Salvatore Mannuzza; Kristin Gotimer; Maria A Ramos-Olazagasti; Jason P Lerch; Yong He; Alex Zijdenbos; Clare Kelly; Michael P Milham; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11

3.  Neural basis of emotional decision making in trait anxiety.

Authors:  Pengfei Xu; Ruolei Gu; Lucas S Broster; Runguo Wu; Nicholas T Van Dam; Yang Jiang; Jin Fan; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Categorization = decision making + generalization.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Meta-analytic clustering dissociates brain activity and behavior profiles across reward processing paradigms.

Authors:  Jessica S Flannery; Michael C Riedel; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Ranjita Poudel; Taylor Salo; Lauren D Hill-Bowen; Angela R Laird; Matthew T Sutherland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Animal to human translational paradigms relevant for approach avoidance conflict decision making.

Authors:  Namik Kirlic; Jared Young; Robin L Aupperle
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-04-24

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms regulating different forms of risk-related decision-making: Insights from animal models.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orsini; David E Moorman; Jared W Young; Barry Setlow; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  A reverse translational approach to quantify approach-avoidance conflict in humans.

Authors:  Robin L Aupperle; Sarah Sullivan; Andrew J Melrose; Martin P Paulus; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Activations of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and thalamus during agentic self-evaluation are negatively associated with trait self-esteem.

Authors:  Ke Jiang; Shi Wu; Zhenhao Shi; Mingyan Liu; Maoying Peng; Yang Shen; Juan Yang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.