Literature DB >> 19361734

Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner.

Badri Thiruvenkatachari1, Mariam Al-Abdallah, Noreen C Akram, Jonathan Sandler, Kevin O'Brien.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our aims in this study were to (1) develop a method of measuring 3-dimensional (3D) tooth movement using a 3D surface laser scanner, (2) test the accuracy of this method, and (3) compare the measurements with those from cephalometric radiographs.
METHODS: A method of superimposing pretreatment and posttreatment models on the palatal rugae was developed, and an experimental model was prepared to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the laser scanner. Records were obtained from a prospective longitudinal randomized clinical trial evaluating anchorage loss with headgears and midpalatal osseointegrated implants as a source of anchorage in Chesterfield, United Kingdom. The pretreatment and posttreatment study models were analyzed by using a 3D laser scanner to measure the 3D tooth movement.
RESULTS: The laser scanner was accurate to 0.0235 mm for anteroposterior measurements and 0.0071 mm for buccolingual movements for every 0.5 mm of movement. The study model analysis showed that mesial molar movements were 1.38 mm on the right side and 1.11 mm on the left side for the implant group, and 2.24 mm on right side and 1.63 mm on left side for the headgear group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. The results for vertical movement of molars showed extrusion on both sides in both groups but no statistically significant difference between the groups. In the transverse plane, the results were not statistically significantly different between the groups. The results from superimposition of lateral cephalograms were similar to those obtained from the scanner.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3D laser scanner provides accurate and reliable measurements of tooth displacement and can be considered an alternative to cephalometric radiographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19361734     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  22 in total

1.  Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems?

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Grant T McIntyre; Ahmed M El-Angbawi; David R Bearn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Skeletally anchored mesialization of molars using digitized casts and two surface-matching approaches : Analysis of treatment effects.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Benedict Wilmes; Chantal Grandjean; Sivabalan Vasudavan; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Association among geometric configurations of palatal rugae.

Authors:  M Saadeh; J G Ghafari; R V Haddad; F Ayoub
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Evaluation of crown inclination and angulation after orthodontic treatment using digital models : Comparison to the prescription of the brackets used.

Authors:  Iury Oliveira Castro; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; José Valladares-Neto; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Superimposition of maxillary digital models using the palatal rugae: Does ageing affect the reliability?

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Marilia S Yatabe; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Camila Massaro; James A McNamara; Hera Kim-Berman; Guilherme Janson; Rolf G Behrents; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models.

Authors:  Ruhi Nalcaci; Ayse Burcu Kocoglu-Altan; Ali Altug Bicakci; Firat Ozturk; Hasan Babacan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Biomechanical model registration for monitoring and simulating large orthodontic tooth movements in the maxilla and mandible.

Authors:  Falko Schmidt; Fatih Kilic; Catrin Verena Gerhart; Bernd Georg Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Comparison and reproducibility of three methods for maxillary digital dental model registration in open bite patients.

Authors:  Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Lorena Vilanova; Guilherme Janson; Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Camila Massaro; Marilia Yatabe; Lucia Cevidanes; Antonio Carlos Ruellas
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Morphometric analysis of palatal rugae in different malocclusions.

Authors:  Maria E Saadeh; Ramzi V Haddad; Joseph G Ghafari
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Effects of Type and Amount of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Digital Model Superimposition Accuracy.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Farhad Salmanpour
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.