Literature DB >> 19361646

Epidemiological and clinical analysis of a consecutive series of conjoined twins in Spain.

María Luisa Martínez-Frías1, Eva Bermejo, Jacobo Mendioroz, Elvira Rodríguez-Pinilla, Manuel Blanco, Javier Egüés, Valentín Félix, Angel García, Héctor Huertas, Carmen Nieto, José Antonio López, Santiago López, Luis Paisán, Alejandro Rosa, María Socorro Vázquez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyze the frequency and certain epidemiological characteristics of a consecutive series of conjoined twins born in Spain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used data from the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations for the period April 1976 to 2006. Because the Spanish law permitting voluntary termination of pregnancies (TOP) when the fetus presented malformations was effective by the end of 1985, we analyzed the data in 4 periods, 2 before 1986 and 2 after. During the first period (1976-1979) only live births were recorded, whereas both still and live births were included in the other three (1980-1985, 1986-1995, and 1996-2006). In the present study, the cases were classified as symmetrical (16 pairs) and asymmetrical (1 pair) conjoined twins. Each pair of conjoined twins was considered as only one case for calculations, regardless of the type of union.
RESULTS: Among a total of 2,281,604 consecutive births between 1980 and 2006, there were a total of 15 cases of symmetrical conjoined twins giving a frequency of 0.70 per 100,000 (1/152,107), whereas there was only 1 stillborn asymmetrical conjoined twin pair (0.04/100,000). Among the 13,418 consecutive stillborns surveyed, 6 cases of conjoined twins were identified (either symmetrical or asymmetrical) giving a frequency of 44.72 per 100,000, and 11 pairs were identified among the 2,425,583 total live births surveyed during the first period 1976 to 1979, a frequency of 0.45 per 100,000. Thus, the frequency among stillborn infants is 99.34 times higher than that observed among live births. However, the frequency for the total births (3 last periods) showed a decreasing trend from 1.47 per 100,000 birth in the first period (1980-1985) when TOP was illegal, to a value of 0.09 per 100,000 in the last period, more than 16-fold lower, probably because of the TOP of affected fetuses. Therefore, we consider that the frequencies observed in the period 1980 to 1985 are the basal values in our population. The most frequent type observed was thoracopagus, with an overall prevalence at birth of 0.44 per 100,000 (1/228,160) from 1980 to 2006, representing 58.82% of the total population of symmetric conjoined twin pairs. Diprosopus pairs were the next most common group (11.76%). Most of the cases were females (4 males/11 females), and although this appeared to be mainly because of the thoracopagus pairs (males-females, 2:8), in such a small number of cases, it is not possible to determine the ratios for the other groups. Gestational age was significantly shorter than in control twins for each type studied.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is incorrect to consider that all types of conjoined twins have the same epidemiological characteristics, such as the frequency at birth. The differences observed may be related with the distinct embryo-fetal mortality of each type of conjoined twins in different populations, and the sex ratio, among others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19361646     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  7 in total

Review 1.  Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research.

Authors:  Osvaldo M Mutchinick; Leonora Luna-Muñoz; Emmanuelle Amar; Marian K Bakker; Maurizio Clementi; Guido Cocchi; Maria da Graça Dutra; Marcia L Feldkamp; Danielle Landau; Emanuele Leoncini; Zhu Li; Brian Lowry; Lisa K Marengo; María-Luisa Martínez-Frías; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Julia Métneki; Margery Morgan; Anna Pierini; Anke Rissman; Annukka Ritvanen; Gioacchino Scarano; Csaba Siffel; Elena Szabova; Jazmín Arteaga-Vázquez
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.908

2.  Parasitic rachipagus twins; report of two cases.

Authors:  Ami Amini Navaei; Zohreh Habibi; Ehsan Moradi; Farideh Nejat
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Heteropagus twins: six cases with systematic review and embryological insights.

Authors:  Praveen Mathur; Shilpa Sharma; Priyanka Mittal; Raj Kumar Yadav; Dinesh Barolia
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Parapagus dicephalus dibrachus dipus: A case of conjoined twins.

Authors:  Abdullah Karaer; Ismail Tanrıkulu; Nedim Güneş; Ediz Cakır; Afşin Oztaş
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Pre- and postnatal findings of a dicephalus tetrabrachius-dipus conjoined twins with a diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Rafael Fabiano Machado Rosa; Luciano Vieira Targa; Stephan Philip Leonhardt Altmayer; Karen Lizeth Puma Lliguin; Daniela Denardin; André Campos da Cunha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

6.  Dicephalus dipus dibrachius twins: report of an autopsy case.

Authors:  Cristiano Claudino Oliveira; Claudia Aparecida Rainho; Maria Aparecida Custódio Domingues
Journal:  Autops Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-30

7.  Successful separation of xypho-omphalopagus conjoined twins with extrauterine twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Ruža Grizelj; Nada Sindičić Dessardo; Krešimir Bulić; Tomislav Luetić; Danko Mikulić; Anko Antabak; Ivica Sjekavica; Ana Marija Alduk; Sanja Konosić; Karolina Režek Tomašić; Tomislav Ćaleta; Sanja Pleško; Dalibor Šarić; Jurica Vuković
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 1.351

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.