Literature DB >> 19360863

Effectiveness of the transradial approach to reduce bleedings in patients undergoing urgent coronary angioplasty with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes.

Marco De Carlo1, Gabriele Borelli, Roberto Gistri, Nicola Ciabatti, Alessandra Mazzoni, Marco Arena, A Sonia Petronio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effectiveness of the transradial approach in reducing bleeding rates following urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs).
BACKGROUND: PCI and use of GPIs are recommended in acute coronary syndromes, but are strong predictors of severe hemorrhagic complications, which, in turn, are associated with reduced survival. The transradial approach represents a simple and effective solution to reduce vascular access site bleedings, particularly with GPIs.
METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing urgent transradial PCI under GPI treatment were enrolled in the registry. No patients were excluded. In addition, we performed a case-matched comparison of the transradial versus transfemoral approach using propensity analysis to adjust for known risk factors for bleeding. The primary end point was the rate of bleedings, graded according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classification.
RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-one consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in the registry. TIMI major, minor, and minimal bleedings were 0.2%, 1.7%, and 6.4%, respectively. Transfusion rate was 0.8%. After propensity-matched analysis, the transradial approach was associated with significantly lower rates of all types of bleedings, while the transfemoral approach was the strongest predictor of TIMI major/minor bleedings (odds ratio 6.67; 95% confidence interval 1.72-25; P = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: The transradial approach dramatically reduces access site bleedings, including TIMI major and minor bleedings, and transfusion rate, while preserving procedural success and clinical outcome. The transradial approach is an attractive solution to reduce bleeding complications in patients treated with GPIs. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19360863     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  RUC-4: a novel αIIbβ3 antagonist for prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jihong Li; Spandana Vootukuri; Yi Shang; Ana Negri; Jian-Kang Jiang; Mark Nedelman; Thomas G Diacovo; Marta Filizola; Craig J Thomas; Barry S Coller
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Expert Opinion: Transradial Coronary Artery Procedures: Tips for Success.

Authors:  Kully Sandhu; Robert Butler; James Nolan
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-05

3.  Analysis of safety outcomes for radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention from a large clinical registry.

Authors:  David R Dobies; Kimberly R Barber; Amanda L Cohoon
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-08-03

4.  Impact of Antecedent Aspirin Use on Infarct Size, Bleeding and Composite Endpoint in Patients with de Novo Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Asim Enhos; Erdem Karacop
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.