Literature DB >> 19359930

Surgical treatment of metastatic fractures of the femur: a retrospective analysis of 142 patients.

Kambiz Sarahrudi1, Manfred Greitbauer, Patrick Platzer, Jan-Till Hausmann, Thomas Heinz, Vilmos Vécsei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathologic fractures of long bones are common complications of the metastatic disease; however, the influence of the primary tumor, the stage of metastatic disease, different surgical techniques, and the postoperative mobility on the postoperative survival has not been clearly defined. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate outcome after surgical treatment for pathologic femur fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 142 patients with metastatic fractures of femur were retrospectively studied. The operative treatment was based on intramedullary fixation (n = 94), gliding screws (n = 15), other extramedullary fixation devices (n = 7), and arthroplasty (n = 23).
RESULTS: Seventeen percent and 6% of the patients survived 1 year and 2 years, respectively, postoperatively. Postoperative survival was higher in patients with pathologic femur fractures because of breast carcinoma than in patients with other primary tumors. The rate of complications for patients with intramedullary stabilization, gliding screw fixation, and endoprosthetic replacement was 3.2%, 20%, and 8.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although many studies describe the endoprosthetic replacement as the safer method to treat pathologic femur fractures, our data showed that intramedullary stabilization and endoprosthetic replacement to be safe, and equivalent alternatives to treat complete pathologic fractures of the femur in patients with advanced metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19359930     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181622bca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  22 in total

1.  What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?

Authors:  Joel R Peterson; Alexander P Decilveo; Ian T O'Connor; Ivan Golub; James C Wittig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?

Authors:  Julie J Willeumier; Mustafa Kaynak; Peer van der Zwaal; Sven A G Meylaerts; Nina M C Mathijssen; Paul C Jutte; Panagiotis Tsagozis; Rikard Wedin; Michiel A J van de Sande; Marta Fiocco; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Association of the Anterolateral Thigh Osteomyocutaneous Flap With Femur Structural Integrity and Assessment of Prophylactic Fixation.

Authors:  Mitchell L Worley; Travis M Patterson; Evan M Graboyes; Yongren Wu; Robert M Brody; Joshua Hornig; Zeke Walton
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal metastases: is it necessary to protect the femoral neck?

Authors:  Bryan Moon; Patrick Lin; Robert Satcher; Justin Bird; Valerae Lewis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Matthew Steensma; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Double-plate compound osteosynthesis for pathological fractures of the proximal femur: high survivorship and low complication rate.

Authors:  Sophie R Merckaert; Christian D Fontanellaz-Castiglione; Eric D Fornari; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Surgical management of metastatic lesions of the proximal femur with pathological fractures using intramedullary nailing or endoprosthetic replacement.

Authors:  Zeping Yu; Yan Xiong; Rui Shi; Li Min; Wenli Zhang; Hongyuan Liu; Xiang Fang; Chongqi Tu; Hong Duan
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-15

8.  Trends in the surgical treatment of pathologic proximal femur fractures among Musculoskeletal Tumor Society members.

Authors:  Matthew Steensma; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Treatment for long bone metastases based on a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Luca Cevolani; Silvia Spinelli; Andrea Piccioli; Giulio Maccauro; Nicola Baldini; Davide Donati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  Which implant is best after failed treatment for pathologic femur fractures?

Authors:  Jonathan Agner Forsberg; Rikard Wedin; Henrik Bauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.