Literature DB >> 19359513

Peroxiredoxin-6--a potential protein marker for meat tenderness in bovine longissimus thoracis muscle.

X Jia1, E Veiseth-Kent, H Grove, P Kuziora, L Aass, K I Hildrum, K Hollung.   

Abstract

The muscle sarcoplasmic proteins from bovine M. longissimus thoracis muscle were studied using proteomics to identify possible protein markers for meat tenderness. This study included 3 experiments: A1, A2, and B. From a collection of biopsies from the bovine M. longissimus thoracis muscle, excised 4 d before slaughter from 178 Norwegian Red young bulls, 26 biopsies were studied in Exp. A1. Based on Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) values at 7 d postmortem, the biopsies were separated into a tender and a tough group of 13 bulls each and analyzed by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and Western blotting. The 2-DE experiments identified 4 different proteins: stress-70 protein, protein DJ-1, peroxiredoxin-6, and malate dehydrogenase, which were different in abundance in the tender and tough groups. However, only peroxiredoxin-6 was confirmed by quantification from Western blots. Peroxiredoxin-6 is an antioxidant enzyme that plays a role in protecting cells from oxidative stress. Peroxiredoxin-6 was identified through 3 spots of the same molecular weight, but with different pI on the Western blots. Only one of the spots was more abundant in the biopsies from the tender group. In Exp. A2, samples collected 1 h postmortem from the same animals and muscles as in Exp. A1 were analyzed by Western blotting. In these postmortem samples, the same spot from peroxiredoxin-6 as in Exp. A1 was more abundant in the tender group. In addition, one of the other peroxiredoxin-6 spots was also more abundant in the tender group. To verify the results from Exp. A, biopsies from 14 additional animals were analyzed in Exp. B by Western blotting against stress-70 protein, protein DJ-1, peroxiredoxin-6, and malate dehydrogenase. No significant differences between the tough and tender groups could be observed in these biopsies. However, for peroxiredoxin-6, the tendencies pointed in the same direction as in Exp. A. In conclusion, peroxiredoxin-6 might be a potential protein marker for meat tenderness detectable in biopsies and in samples collected shortly after slaughter. However, more animals are needed to verify the findings in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19359513     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-1792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

Review 1.  Peroxiredoxin 6: a bifunctional enzyme with glutathione peroxidase and phospholipase A₂ activities.

Authors:  Aron B Fisher
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 2.  Double Muscling in Cattle: Genes, Husbandry, Carcasses and Meat.

Authors:  Leo O Fiems
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Predicting the Quality of Meat: Myth or Reality?

Authors:  Cécile Berri; Brigitte Picard; Bénédicte Lebret; Donato Andueza; Florence Lefèvre; Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval; Stéphane Beauclercq; Pascal Chartrin; Antoine Vautier; Isabelle Legrand; Jean-François Hocquette
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-09-24

4.  Impact of Extraction Method on the Detection of Quality Biomarkers in Normal vs. DFD Meat.

Authors:  Laura González-Blanco; Yolanda Diñeiro; Andrea Díaz-Luis; Ana Coto-Montes; Mamen Oliván; Verónica Sierra
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-15

5.  Monitoring post mortem changes in porcine muscle through 2-D DIGE proteome analysis of Longissimus muscle exudate.

Authors:  Alessio Di Luca; Giuliano Elia; Anne Maria Mullen; Ruth M Hamill
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Effect of Embryo Vitrification on Rabbit Foetal Placenta Proteome during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Maria Desemparats Saenz-de-Juano; José Salvador Vicente; Kristin Hollung; Francisco Marco-Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Expression Marker-Based Strategy to Improve Beef Quality.

Authors:  Isabelle Cassar-Malek; Brigitte Picard
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-03-15

8.  The Expression of Porcine Prdx6 Gene Is Up-Regulated by C/EBPβ and CREB.

Authors:  Xinyu Wu; Panlong Ji; Liang Zhang; Guowei Bu; Hao Gu; Xiaojing Wang; Yuanzhu Xiong; Bo Zuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative Proteomic Profiling of Divergent Phenotypes for Water Holding Capacity across the Post Mortem Ageing Period in Porcine Muscle Exudate.

Authors:  Alessio Di Luca; Ruth M Hamill; Anne Maria Mullen; Nikolai Slavov; Giuliano Elia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Aggregation of Omic Data and Secretome Prediction Enable the Discovery of Candidate Plasma Biomarkers for Beef Tenderness.

Authors:  Sabrina Boudon; Joelle Henry-Berger; Isabelle Cassar-Malek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.