Literature DB >> 19359340

Standardization of the continuing care activity measure: a multicenter study to assess reliability, validity, and ability to measure change.

Maria P J Huijbregts1, Gary F Teare, Carolyn McCullough, Theresa M Kay, David Streiner, Steve K C Wong, Sara E McEwen, Ingrid Otten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of standardized mobility measures specific to the long-term care (LTC) population. Therefore, the Continuing Care Activity Measure (CCAM) was developed.
OBJECTIVE: This study determined levels of reliability, validity for clinical utilization, and sensitivity to change of this measure.
DESIGN: This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study among elderly people with primarily physical or medical impairments who were residing in LTC institutions that provide nursing home and more-complex care, with access to physical therapy services.
METHOD: The CCAM, the Clinical Outcome Variables Scale (COVS), the Social Engagement Scale (SES) of the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) 2.0 instrument, and the Resource Utilization Groups, version 3, (RUG-III) were administered by clinical and research physical therapists, with timing dictated by the study purpose.
RESULTS: The participants were 136 residents of LTC institutions and 21 physical therapists. The CCAM interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) was .97 (95% confidence interval=.91-1.00), and test-retest reliability (ICC) over a period of 1 week was .99 (95% confidence interval=.93-1.00). Over 6 months, the absolute change in total score was 5.88 for the CCAM and 4.26 for the COVS; the CCAM was 28% more responsive across all participants (n=105) and 68% more responsive for those scoring in the lower half (n=49). The minimal detectable difference of the CCAM was 8.6 across all participants. The CCAM correlated with the COVS, nursing care hours inferred from the RUG-III, and the SES. LIMITATIONS: Some participants were lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The CCAM is a reliable and valid tool to measure gross motor function and physical mobility for elderly people in LTC institutions. It discriminates among functional levels, measures individual functional change, and can contribute to clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19359340     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  3 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review of content and format.

Authors:  Kate Williams; Anja Frei; Anders Vetsch; Fabienne Dobbels; Milo A Puhan; Katja Rüdell
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  PATCH: posture and mobility training for care staff versus usual care in care homes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Liz Graham; Robert Cicero; David Clarke; Bonnie Cundill; Alison Ellwood; Amanda Farrin; Jill Fisher; Madeline Goodwin; Rebecca Hawkins; Karen Hull; Claire Hulme; Dominic Trépel; Rachel Williams; Anne Forster
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  A posture and mobility training package for care home staff: results of a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial (the PATCH trial).

Authors:  Liz Graham; Alison Ellwood; Karen Hull; Jill Fisher; Bonnie Cundill; Michael Holland; Madeline Goodwin; David Clarke; Rebecca Hawkins; Claire Hulme; Ismail Patel; Charlotte Kelly; Rachel Williams; Amanda Farrin; Anne Forster
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 10.668

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.