BACKGROUND: Measures of oxygenation have not been assessed for prognostic significance in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: 83 subjects with SSc-ILD performed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test with an arterial line. The agreement between peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was examined and survival differences between subgroups of subjects stratified on SpO2 were analysed. Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine the prognostic capabilities of SpO2. RESULTS: At maximal exercise the mean (SD) difference between SpO2 and SaO2 was 2.98 (2.98) and only 15 subjects had a difference of >4 points. The survival of subjects with SSc-ILD whose maximum exercise SpO2 (Spo(2)max) fell below 89% or whose SpO2max fell >4 points from baseline was worse than subjects in comparator groups (log rank p = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). The hazard of death during the median 7.1 years of follow-up was 2.4 times greater for subjects whose SpO2max fell below 89% (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.9, p = 0.02) or whose SpO2max fell >4 points from baseline (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.0, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with SSc-ILD, SpO2 is an adequate reflection of SaO2 and radial arterial lines need not be inserted during cardiopulmonary exercise tests in these patients. Given the ease of measurement and its prognostic value, SpO2 should be considered as a meaningful clinical and research outcome in patients with SSc-ILD.
BACKGROUND: Measures of oxygenation have not been assessed for prognostic significance in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: 83 subjects with SSc-ILD performed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test with an arterial line. The agreement between peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) was examined and survival differences between subgroups of subjects stratified on SpO2 were analysed. Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine the prognostic capabilities of SpO2. RESULTS: At maximal exercise the mean (SD) difference between SpO2 and SaO2 was 2.98 (2.98) and only 15 subjects had a difference of >4 points. The survival of subjects with SSc-ILD whose maximum exercise SpO2 (Spo(2)max) fell below 89% or whose SpO2max fell >4 points from baseline was worse than subjects in comparator groups (log rank p = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). The hazard of death during the median 7.1 years of follow-up was 2.4 times greater for subjects whose SpO2max fell below 89% (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.9, p = 0.02) or whose SpO2max fell >4 points from baseline (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.0, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with SSc-ILD, SpO2 is an adequate reflection of SaO2 and radial arterial lines need not be inserted during cardiopulmonary exercise tests in these patients. Given the ease of measurement and its prognostic value, SpO2 should be considered as a meaningful clinical and research outcome in patients with SSc-ILD.
Authors: Demosthenes Bouros; Athol U Wells; Andrew G Nicholson; Thomas V Colby; Vlasis Polychronopoulos; Panos Pantelidis; Patricia L Haslam; Dimitris A Vassilakis; Carol M Black; Roland M du Bois Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nicole S L Goh; Sujal R Desai; Srihari Veeraraghavan; David M Hansell; Susan J Copley; Toby M Maher; Tamera J Corte; Clare R Sander; Jonathan Ratoff; Anand Devaraj; Gracijela Bozovic; Christopher P Denton; Carol M Black; Roland M du Bois; Athol U Wells Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Talmadge E King; Jürgen Behr; Kevin K Brown; Roland M du Bois; Lisa Lancaster; Joao A de Andrade; Gerd Stähler; Isabelle Leconte; Sébastien Roux; Ganesh Raghu Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: C P Simeón; L Armadans; V Fonollosa; R Solans; A Selva; M Villar; J Lima; J Vaqué; M Vilardell Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; James R Seibold; Athol Wells; Oliver Distler; Yannick Allanore; Chris Denton; Daniel E Furst Journal: Curr Rheumatol Rev Date: 2010-05-01
Authors: Matthew R Lammi; Robert P Baughman; Surinder S Birring; Anne-Marie Russell; Jay H Ryu; Marybeth Scholand; Oliver Distler; Daphne LeSage; Catherine Sarver; Katerina Antoniou; Kristin B Highland; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Joseph A Lasky; Athol U Wells; Lesley Ann Saketkoo Journal: Curr Respir Med Rev Date: 2015
Authors: Julie Morisset; Eric Vittinghoff; Brett M Elicker; Xiaowen Hu; Stephanie Le; Jay H Ryu; Kirk D Jones; Anna Haemel; Jeffrey A Golden; Francesco Boin; Brett Ley; Paul J Wolters; Talmadge E King; Harold R Collard; Joyce S Lee Journal: Chest Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; James Seibold; Jonathan Goldin; Donald P Tashkin; Daniel E Furst; Athol Wells Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Graham Dinsdale; Sarah Wilkinson; Jack Wilkinson; Tonia L Moore; Joanne B Manning; Michael Berks; Elizabeth Marjanovic; Mark Dickinson; Ariane L Herrick; Andrea K Murray Journal: Microvasc Res Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 3.514
Authors: Chunhu Shi; Mark Goodall; Jo Dumville; James Hill; Gill Norman; Oliver Hamer; Andrew Clegg; Caroline Leigh Watkins; George Georgiou; Alexander Hodkinson; Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody; Paul Dark; Nicky Cullum Journal: BMC Med Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 11.150
Authors: Wendy Marilú Ramos-Hernández; Luis F Soto; Marcos Del Rosario-Trinidad; Carlos Noe Farfan-Morales; Luis Adrián De Jesús-González; Gustavo Martínez-Mier; Juan Fidel Osuna-Ramos; Fernando Bastida-González; Víctor Bernal-Dolores; Rosa María Del Ángel; José Manuel Reyes-Ruiz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.996