John W Newcomer 1 , Robert E Ratner , Jan W Eriksson , Robin Emsley , Didier Meulien , Frank Miller , Julia Leonova-Edlund , Ronald W Leong , Martin Brecher . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
OBJECTIVE: This randomized, 24-week, flexible-dose study compared changes in glucose metabolism in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia receiving initial exposure to olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone . METHOD: The hypothesized primary endpoint was change (baseline to week 24) in area under the curve (AUC ) 0- to 2-hour plasma glucose values during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); primary analysis: olanzapine versus quetiapine . Secondary endpoints included mean change in AUC 0- to 2-hour plasma insulin values, insulin sensitivity index, and fasting lipids . The first patient enrolled on April 29, 2004, and the last patient completed the study on October 24, 2005 . RESULTS: Mean weight change (kg ) over 24 weeks was +3.7 (quetiapine), +4.6 (olanzapine), and +3.6 (risperidone ). Based on data from 395 patients (quetiapine, N = 115 [mean dose = 607.0 mg/day], olanzapine, N = 146 [mean dose = 15.2 mg/day], and risperidone , N = 134 [mean dose = 5.2 mg/day]), mean change in AUC 0- to 2-hour glucose value (mg/dL x h) at week 24 was significantly lower for quetiapine versus olanzapine (t = 1.98, df = 377, p = .048). Increases in AUC 0- to 2-hour glucose values were statistically significant with olanzapine (+21.9 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = 11.5 to 32.4 mg/dL x h) and risperidone (+18.8 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = 8.1 to 29.4 mg/dL x h), but not quetiapine (+9.1 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = -2.3 to 20.5 mg/dL x h). AUC 0- to 2-hour insulin values increased statistically significantly with olanzapine (+24.5%, 95% CI = 11.5% to 39.0%), but not with quetiapine or risperidone . Reductions in insulin sensitivity index were statistically significant with olanzapine (-19.1%, 95% CI = -27.9% to -9.3%) and risperidone (-15.8%, 95% CI = -25.1% to -5.4%), but not quetiapine . Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels increased statistically significantly with olanzapine (+21.1 mg/dL, 95% CI = 13.0 to 29.2 mg/dL, and +20.5 mg/dL, 95% CI = 13.8 to 27.1 mg/dL, respectively) and quetiapine (+13.1 mg/dL, 95% CI = 4.3 to 21.9 mg/dL, and +13.3 mg/dL, 95% CI = 6.1 to 20.5 mg/dL, respectively), but not risperidone . Statistically significant increases in triglycerides (+30.9 mg/dL, 95% CI = 10.9 to 51.0 mg/dL), total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio (0.5, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.8), and triglyceride/HDL ratio (0.3, 95% CI = 0.0 to 0.6) were observed with olanzapine only. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a significant difference in the change in glucose tolerance during 6 months' treatment with olanzapine versus quetiapine , with significant reductions on olanzapine and risperidone , but not quetiapine ; these differential changes were largely explained by changes in insulin sensitivity . TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00214578. ©Copyright 2009 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
OBJECTIVE: This randomized, 24-week, flexible-dose study compared changes in glucose metabolism in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia receiving initial exposure to olanzapine , quetiapine , or risperidone . METHOD: The hypothesized primary endpoint was change (baseline to week 24) in area under the curve (AUC) 0- to 2-hour plasma glucose values during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); primary analysis: olanzapine versus quetiapine . Secondary endpoints included mean change in AUC 0- to 2-hour plasma insulin values, insulin sensitivity index, and fasting lipids . The first patient enrolled on April 29, 2004, and the last patient completed the study on October 24, 2005. RESULTS: Mean weight change (kg) over 24 weeks was +3.7 (quetiapine ), +4.6 (olanzapine ), and +3.6 (risperidone ). Based on data from 395 patients (quetiapine , N = 115 [mean dose = 607.0 mg/day], olanzapine , N = 146 [mean dose = 15.2 mg/day], and risperidone , N = 134 [mean dose = 5.2 mg/day]), mean change in AUC 0- to 2-hour glucose value (mg/dL x h) at week 24 was significantly lower for quetiapine versus olanzapine (t = 1.98, df = 377, p = .048). Increases in AUC 0- to 2-hour glucose values were statistically significant with olanzapine (+21.9 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = 11.5 to 32.4 mg/dL x h) and risperidone (+18.8 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = 8.1 to 29.4 mg/dL x h), but not quetiapine (+9.1 mg/dL x h, 95% CI = -2.3 to 20.5 mg/dL x h). AUC 0- to 2-hour insulin values increased statistically significantly with olanzapine (+24.5%, 95% CI = 11.5% to 39.0%), but not with quetiapine or risperidone . Reductions in insulin sensitivity index were statistically significant with olanzapine (-19.1%, 95% CI = -27.9% to -9 .3%) and risperidone (-15.8%, 95% CI = -25.1% to -5.4%), but not quetiapine . Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels increased statistically significantly with olanzapine (+21.1 mg/dL, 95% CI = 13.0 to 29.2 mg/dL, and +20.5 mg/dL, 95% CI = 13.8 to 27.1 mg/dL, respectively) and quetiapine (+13.1 mg/dL, 95% CI = 4.3 to 21.9 mg/dL, and +13.3 mg/dL, 95% CI = 6.1 to 20.5 mg/dL, respectively), but not risperidone . Statistically significant increases in triglycerides (+30.9 mg/dL, 95% CI = 10.9 to 51.0 mg/dL), total cholesterol /high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio (0.5, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.8), and triglyceride /HDL ratio (0.3, 95% CI = 0.0 to 0.6) were observed with olanzapine only. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a significant difference in the change in glucose tolerance during 6 months' treatment with olanzapine versus quetiapine , with significant reductions on olanzapine and risperidone , but not quetiapine ; these differential changes were largely explained by changes in insulin sensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00214578. ©Copyright 2009 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Mutation
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2009
PMID: 19358783 PMCID: PMC3703648 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.08m04132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Psychiatry ISSN: 0160-6689 Impact factor: 4.384