| Literature DB >> 19358729 |
Afonso de Almeida1, Ana Paula Arez, Pedro Vl Cravo, Virgílio E do Rosário.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In response to chloroquine (CQ) resistance, the policy for the first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the Democratic Republic of East Timor (DRET) was changed in early 2000. The combination of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was then introduced for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19358729 PMCID: PMC2672086 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Map of the Democratic Republic of East Timor showing locations of the districts surveyed.
Frequency (%) of the Pfdhfr (codons 51, 59 and 108), Pfdhps (codons 437 and 540), Pfcrt (codons 76 and 75), Pdmdr1 (codons 86 and 1246) genotypes and multiple mutations in first and second assay periods.
| (wild-type) N | 16 | 100 | 27 | 56 | |
| (Mutant) E | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13 | |
| N + E | 0 | 0 | 15 | 31 | |
| Not determined | 22 | 22 | |||
| (wild-type) K | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| (Mutant) T | 32 | 97 | 59 | 100 | |
| K + T | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Not determined | 5 | 15 | |||
| (wild-type) N | 8 | 24 | 18 | 27 | |
| (Mutant) Y | 13 | 38 | 37 | 56 | |
| N + Y | 13 | 38 | 11 | 17 | |
| Not determined | 4 | 8 | |||
| (wild-type) D | 32 | 100 | 64 | 97 | |
| (Mutant) Y | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| D + Y | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Not determined | 6 | 8 | |||
| (wild-type) N | 9 | 24 | 8 | 11 | |
| (Mutant) I | 25 | 66 | 66 | 89 | |
| N + I | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Not determined | 0 | 0 | |||
| (wild-type) C | 11 | 29 | 9 | 14 | |
| (Mutant) R | 24 | 63 | 53 | 84 | |
| C + R | 3 | 8 | 1 | 2 | |
| Not determined | 0 | 11 | |||
| (wild-type) S | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| (Mutant) N | 28 | 100 | 62 | 97 | |
| S + N | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Not determined | 10 | 10 | |||
| (wild-type) A | 14 | 40 | 0 | 0 | |
| (Mutant) G | 21 | 60 | 67 | 100 | |
| A + G | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Not determined | 3 | 7 | |||
| (wild-type) K | 34 | 97 | 67 | 100 | |
| (Mutant) E | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| K + E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Not determined | 3 | 7 | |||
| dhfr 51I+108N | 19 | 68 | 60 | 97 | |
| dhfr 59R+108N | 17 | 61 | 52 | 84 | |
| dhfr 51I +59R+108N | 16 | 57 | 53 | 86 | |
| dhfr 51I +59R+108N+dhps 437G | 13 | 46 | 51 | 82 | |
Significant associations between different alleles of the Pfdhfr e Pfdhps genes.
| 51 × 437 (N = 31) | N-A (wild-type) | 8 | P = 0.001 < 0.05 |
| I-G (mutant) | 21 | ||
| 59 × 437 (N = 33) | C-A (wild-type) | 7 | P = 0.001 < 0.05 |
| R-G (mutant) | 18 |