Literature DB >> 19358185

Capturing the magic: assessing the quality of youth mentoring relationships.

Nancy L Deutsch1, Renée Spencer.   

Abstract

Mentoring programs pose some special challenges for quality assessment because they operate at two levels: that of the dyadic relationship and that of the program. Fully assessing the quality of youth mentoring relationships requires understanding the characteristics and processes of individual relationships, which are the point of service for mentoring. Yet we also must consider the program components that support their development. A number of factors have been indicated to contribute to quality mentoring relationships, including frequency and consistency of contact, feelings of connection between mentor and protégé, and the mentor's approach. Program features linked with quality relationships include mentor screening and training and expectations for frequency of contact. Assessing the quality of the relationship directly requires measuring both the mentor's and protégé's perceptions of important dimensions of the relationship, such as goals, engagement, and closeness. Single-point-in-time surveys or interviews, using both validated measures and open-ended questions, may be used as tools for assessing individual relationships at the conclusion of programs. Short surveys, logs, and observations may be useful for periodic or ongoing assessment of quality for support and intervention purposes. Focus groups and surveys of mentors may also provide useful information for assessing program components needed to support the development and maintenance of high quality relationships. The benefits and drawbacks of each of these methods for assessing relational quality are discussed. Mentoring programs are provided with references for specific tools that may be used to assess relational quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19358185     DOI: 10.1002/yd.296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Dir Youth Dev        ISSN: 1533-8916


  10 in total

1.  Different roles and different results: how activity orientations correspond to relationship quality and student outcomes in school-based mentoring.

Authors:  Thomas E Keller; Julia M Pryce
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Feasibility of electronic peer mentoring for transition-age youth and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Project Teens making Environment and Activity Modifications.

Authors:  Jessica M Kramer; Cathryn T Ryan; Rachel Moore; Ariel Schwartz
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Revealing Both Sides of the Story: A Comparative Analysis of Mentors and Protégés Relational Perspectives.

Authors:  Shannon M Varga; Nancy L Deutsch
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Mentoring Programs to Affect Delinquency and Associated Outcomes of Youth At-Risk: A Comprehensive Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Patrick H Tolan; David B Henry; Michael S Schoeny; Peter Lovegrove; Emily Nichols
Journal:  J Exp Criminol       Date:  2014-06-01

5.  Youth Mentoring Relationships in Context: Mentor Perceptions of Youth, Environment, and the Mentor Role.

Authors:  Davielle Lakind; Marc Atkins; J Mark Eddy
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  Do mentor support for ethnic-racial identity and mentee cultural mistrust matter for girls of color? A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Bernadette Sánchez; Julia Pryce; Naida Silverthorn; Kelsey L Deane; David L DuBois
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Pathways of influence in school-based mentoring: the mediating role of parent and teacher relationships.

Authors:  Christian S Chan; Jean E Rhodes; Waylon J Howard; Sarah R Lowe; Sarah E O Schwartz; Carla Herrera
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2012-10-31

8.  Enabling relationship formation, development, and closure in a one-year female mentoring program at a non-governmental organization: a mixed-method study.

Authors:  Madelene Larsson; Camilla Pettersson; Therése Skoog; Charli Eriksson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A Web-Based Intervention for Youth With Physical Disabilities: Comparing the Role of Mentors in 12- and 4-Week Formats.

Authors:  Sally Lindsay; Elaine Cagliostro
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2020-01-08

Review 10.  Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Limor Goldner; Adar Ben-Eliyahu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.