Literature DB >> 19358027

Delivery after caesarean section: consultant obstetricians' professional advice and personal preferences.

S Sur1, K W Murphy, I Z Mackenzie.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine how obstetricians would wish to be managed in their own pregnancy and their advice to patients delivering after a caesarean section. A questionnaire was sent to 219 consultant obstetricians in two large UK medical deaneries investigating their personal preferences for delivery and management of spontaneous, augmented and induced labour after a caesarean section and how they advise their patients related to the indication for the previous caesarean section. Responses were analysed according to age and gender. The questionnaire yielded a 68% response rate. None would counsel against labour unless there were contraindications. The majority would recommend labour for all indications for the previous caesarean section, although personal preferences were lower (p<0.04): 56% would recommend labour to their patients after a failed instrumental delivery, but only 36% would personally choose that option (p<0.002). Female obstetricians would contemplate and recommend labour more readily than males. Labour augmentation and induction was more frequently recommended (66% and 57%, respectively) than opted for personally (57% and 52%). Reluctance for labour augmentation and induction was greatest among younger consultants. While the majority of consultants favour labour for themselves and recommend this for their patients, it was reassuring to note that patients are encouraged to make the final decision. Informed patient choice is paramount and it is therefore important that full information about risks and benefits is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19358027     DOI: 10.1080/01443610902735785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  5 in total

1.  Impact of alternative reimbursement strategies in the new cooperative medical scheme on caesarean delivery rates: a mixed-method study in rural China.

Authors:  Kun Huang; Fangbiao Tao; Lennart Bogg; Shenglan Tang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Miloš Velemínský; Miloš Velemínsky; Martina Piskorzová; Martina Bašková; Valérie Tóthová; Pravoslav Stránský
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02

3.  Factors obstetricians, family physicians and midwives consider when counselling women about a trial of labour after caesarean and planned repeat caesarean: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Christine Kurtz Landy; Wendy Sword; Jackie Cramp Kathnelson; Sarah McDonald; Anne Biringer; Maureen Heaman; Pam Angle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zhong-Chen Luo; Xu Liu; Anni Wang; Jian-Qiong Li; Ze-Hong Zheng; Sun Guiyu; Ting Lou; Jin Pang; Xiao-Ling Bai
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  A retrospective cohort study of mode of delivery among public and private patients in an integrated maternity hospital setting.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.