Literature DB >> 19358013

Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.

Nash Unsworth1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the notion that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) are partially due to differences in search set size in cued recall. High and low WMC individuals performed variants of a cued recall task with either unrelated cue words (Experiment 1) or specific cue phrases (Experiment 2). Across both experiments low WMC individuals recalled fewer items, made more errors, and had longer correct recall latencies than high WMC individuals. Cross-experimental analyses suggested that providing participants with more specific cues decreased the size of the search set, leading to better recall overall. However, these effects were equivalent for high and low WMC. It is argued that these results are consistent with a search model framework in which low WMC individuals search through a larger set of items than high WMC individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19358013     DOI: 10.1080/09658210902802959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.

Authors:  Ashley L Miller; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

2.  Remembering to prepare: The benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity.

Authors:  Lauren L Richmond; Thomas S Redick; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Similarities and differences between working memory and long-term memory: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Joel Myerson; Henry L Roediger; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

5.  Working memory and insight in verbal problems: analysis of compound remote associates.

Authors:  Jason M Chein; Robert W Weisberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

6.  Errorful and errorless learning: The impact of cue-target constraint in learning from errors.

Authors:  Emma K Bridger; Axel Mecklinger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

7.  High working memory capacity predicts less retrieval induced forgetting.

Authors:  Jonathan T Mall; Candice C Morey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.