BACKGROUND: Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) is an outpatient radiation therapy procedure in which a highly focused dose of radiation is delivered in a single fraction. It is used to treat a variety of well-demarcated intracranial lesions, including brain tumors. This study aims to explore patients' perspectives of the GKSRS process and the various stages involved. METHODS: Qualitative research methodology was used. Three semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 29 participants, who were ambulatory adult patients who underwent GKSRS between August 2007 and August 2008. RESULTS: Seven overarching themes emerged from the data: (1) patients were satisfied with the overall treatment experience; (2) the majority of patients had a good knowledge of GKSRS; (3) the quality and amount of patient education were adequate; (4) process expectations were largely met; (5) most patients prioritized outcome over process; (6) most patients had a realistic expectation of outcomes; and (7) pain and anxiety were important issues. CONCLUSIONS: The study results reflected positively on the GKSRS process, but there were some areas identified that require improvement, specifically the referral-consultation process and the management of procedural pain. These insights on the patients' perspectives can lead to better delivery of care and ultimately, improved health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) is an outpatient radiation therapy procedure in which a highly focused dose of radiation is delivered in a single fraction. It is used to treat a variety of well-demarcated intracranial lesions, including brain tumors. This study aims to explore patients' perspectives of the GKSRS process and the various stages involved. METHODS: Qualitative research methodology was used. Three semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 29 participants, who were ambulatory adult patients who underwent GKSRS between August 2007 and August 2008. RESULTS: Seven overarching themes emerged from the data: (1) patients were satisfied with the overall treatment experience; (2) the majority of patients had a good knowledge of GKSRS; (3) the quality and amount of patient education were adequate; (4) process expectations were largely met; (5) most patients prioritized outcome over process; (6) most patients had a realistic expectation of outcomes; and (7) pain and anxiety were important issues. CONCLUSIONS: The study results reflected positively on the GKSRS process, but there were some areas identified that require improvement, specifically the referral-consultation process and the management of procedural pain. These insights on the patients' perspectives can lead to better delivery of care and ultimately, improved health outcomes.
Authors: Gene H Barnett; Mark E Linskey; John R Adler; Jeffrey W Cozzens; William A Friedman; M Peter Heilbrun; L Dade Lunsford; Michael Schulder; Andrew E Sloan Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Shobhan Vachhrajani; Charbel Fawaz; David Mathieu; Cynthia Ménard; Michael D Cusimano; Fred Gentili; Mojgan Hodaie; Brendan Kenny; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Normand Laperriere; Michael Schwartz; May Tsao; Mark Bernstein Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Steven K M Lau; Kunal Patel; Teddy Kim; Erik Knipprath; Gwe-Ya Kim; Laura I Cerviño; Joshua D Lawson; Kevin T Murphy; Parag Sanghvi; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michael K Rooney; Daniel W Golden; John Byun; Rimas V Lukas; Adam M Sonabend; Maciej S Lesniak; Sean Sachdev Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2019-07-03
Authors: Charlotte J Whiffin; Brandon G Smith; Santhani M Selveindran; Tom Bashford; Ignatius N Esene; Harry Mee; M Tariq Barki; Ronnie E Baticulon; Kathleen J Khu; Peter J Hutchinson; Angelos G Kolias Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 2.210