BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias can result in significant postoperative pain necessitating a prolonged hospital stay, increased narcotic use, and patient dissatisfaction. Elastomeric pain pump devices with local analgesics may significantly reduce postoperative discomfortafter laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. This prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effect of local anesthetic continuously infused with an elastomeric pain pump device to reduce postoperative pain. METHODS: After institutional review board approval of the study, all patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair consented to participate. Standardized technique included routine transfascial fixation sutures and titanium spiral tacks. Elastomeric pain pumps were placed percutaneously just above the mesh in the hernia sac. For 48 h postoperatively, 100 ml of continuous 0.5% Marcaine or normal saline was used at 2 ml/h. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated every 8 h for the first 72 h, then after 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months for pain scores, narcotic usage (both oral and intravenous), return of flatus, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 73 patients enrolled in the study, 37 received 0.5% Marcaine, and 36 receivedplacebo. Despite randomization, the control group had significantly more obese patients (mean body mass index [BMI], 39 vs. 33 kg/m(2); p = 0.005), and more recurrent hernias (40% vs. 19%; p = 0.05), and also tended to have more prior hernia repairs (0.8 vs. 0.3; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative times (p = 0.7), hernia size (p = 0.9), mesh size (p = 0.6), number of transfascial fixation sutures (p = 0.4), or number of spiral tacks (p = 0.13). Postoperative visual analog pain scores, usage of oral or intravenous narcotics, and morphine equivalents were similar between the two groups at all study points (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups based on return of bowel function, toleration of a regular diet, or length of hospital stay. No postoperative complications directly related to the catheter were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed no advantage of an elastomeric pain pump device in terms of providing a measurable reduction in postoperative pain scores, narcotic use, time to return of bowel function, or length of hospital stayafter laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Further studies are warranted to determine other alternatives for reducing postoperative painafter laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias can result in significant postoperative pain necessitating a prolonged hospital stay, increased narcotic use, and patient dissatisfaction. Elastomeric pain pump devices with local analgesics may significantly reduce postoperative discomfort after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. This prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effect of local anesthetic continuously infused with an elastomeric pain pump device to reduce postoperative pain. METHODS: After institutional review board approval of the study, all patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair consented to participate. Standardized technique included routine transfascial fixation sutures and titanium spiral tacks. Elastomeric pain pumps were placed percutaneously just above the mesh in the hernia sac. For 48 h postoperatively, 100 ml of continuous 0.5% Marcaine or normal saline was used at 2 ml/h. Postoperatively, the patients were evaluated every 8 h for the first 72 h, then after 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months for pain scores, narcotic usage (both oral and intravenous), return of flatus, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 73 patients enrolled in the study, 37 received 0.5% Marcaine, and 36 received placebo. Despite randomization, the control group had significantly more obesepatients (mean body mass index [BMI], 39 vs. 33 kg/m(2); p = 0.005), and more recurrent hernias (40% vs. 19%; p = 0.05), and also tended to have more prior hernia repairs (0.8 vs. 0.3; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative times (p = 0.7), hernia size (p = 0.9), mesh size (p = 0.6), number of transfascial fixation sutures (p = 0.4), or number of spiral tacks (p = 0.13). Postoperative visual analog pain scores, usage of oral or intravenous narcotics, and morphine equivalents were similar between the two groups at all study points (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups based on return of bowel function, toleration of a regular diet, or length of hospital stay. No postoperative complications directly related to the catheter were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed no advantage of an elastomeric pain pump device in terms of providing a measurable reduction in postoperative pain scores, narcotic use, time to return of bowel function, or length of hospital stay after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Further studies are warranted to determine other alternatives for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Authors: E E Ashcraft; G M Baillie; S F Shafizadeh; J R McEvoy; H K Mohamed; A Lin; P K Baliga; J Rogers; P R Rajagopalan; K D Chavin Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2001 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: B J Ramshaw; P Esartia; J Schwab; E M Mason; R A Wilson; T D Duncan; J Miller; G W Lucas; J Promes Journal: Am Surg Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Grayson H Wheatley; David H Rosenbaum; Michelle C Paul; Alan P Dine; Michael A Wait; Dan M Meyer; Michael E Jessen; W Steves Ring; J Michael DiMaio Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Alfredo M Carbonell; Kristi L Harold; Aida J Mahmutovic; Reem Hassan; Brent D Matthews; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford Journal: Am Surg Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: David Earle; J Scott Roth; Alan Saber; Steve Haggerty; Joel F Bradley; Robert Fanelli; Raymond Price; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-06-20
Authors: Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-04-25