OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) in relation to personal characteristics in employed populations. Further validate the PAM for use in improving clinical or employer-based health-intervention programs. METHODS: Data for analysis were taken from baseline survey information and health screenings collected during a randomized, controlled trial testing two different health promotion programs. Study population included 625 employees (predominantly white collar) from two companies in the northern Midwest of the United States: a large, integrated health care system and a national airline. RESULTS: PAM's psychometric properties are robust in two employed populations. Activation is directly related not only to health status, but also to job performance measures. The strong positive relationship of PAM to measures of healthy behavior, health information-seeking and readiness-to-change further validate the measure. Commonly, a difference of 5 points on the PAM separated healthy from less healthy behaviors. CONCLUSION: Activation can be understood in a broader population health context and need not be restricted to people with chronic illnesses. The study provides guidance on how to interpret PAM scores. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The PAM can be used as part of any health-intervention program designed to improve patients' or employees' self-management skills, whether the program is clinic-based or employer-based. 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) in relation to personal characteristics in employed populations. Further validate the PAM for use in improving clinical or employer-based health-intervention programs. METHODS: Data for analysis were taken from baseline survey information and health screenings collected during a randomized, controlled trial testing two different health promotion programs. Study population included 625 employees (predominantly white collar) from two companies in the northern Midwest of the United States: a large, integrated health care system and a national airline. RESULTS: PAM's psychometric properties are robust in two employed populations. Activation is directly related not only to health status, but also to job performance measures. The strong positive relationship of PAM to measures of healthy behavior, health information-seeking and readiness-to-change further validate the measure. Commonly, a difference of 5 points on the PAM separated healthy from less healthy behaviors. CONCLUSION: Activation can be understood in a broader population health context and need not be restricted to people with chronic illnesses. The study provides guidance on how to interpret PAM scores. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The PAM can be used as part of any health-intervention program designed to improve patients' or employees' self-management skills, whether the program is clinic-based or employer-based. 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Ruth Q Wolever; Daniel M Webber; Justin P Meunier; Jeffrey M Greeson; Evangeline R Lausier; Tracy W Gaudet Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.305
Authors: Catherine E Dingley; Margaret Clayton; Djin Lai; Katherine Doyon; Maija Reblin; Lee Ellington Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Suzanne E Mitchell; Paula M Gardiner; Ekaterina Sadikova; Jessica M Martin; Brian W Jack; Judith H Hibbard; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nwamaka D Eneanya; Michael Winter; Howard Cabral; Katherine Waite; Lori Henault; Timothy Bickmore; Amresh Hanchate; Michael Wolf; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2016
Authors: Stephen J Bartels; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Stephanie A Rolin; Delia Cimpean Hendrick; John A Naslund; Marjan J Faber Journal: Psychiatr Rehabil J Date: 2013-11-11
Authors: Lisa Ross DeCamp; Kathryn Leifheit; Harita Shah; Doris Valenzuela-Araujo; Elizabeth Sloand; Sarah Polk; Tina L Cheng Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-07-02