Literature DB >> 19356831

Determination of consistent patterns of range of motion in the ankle joint with a computed tomography stress-test.

Gabriëlle Josephine Maria Tuijthof1, Maartje Zengerink, Lijkele Beimers, Remmet Jonges, Mario Maas, Cornelis Niek van Dijk, Leendert Blankevoort.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measuring the range of motion of the ankle joint can assist in accurate diagnosis of ankle laxity. A computed tomography-based stress-test (3D CT stress-test) was used that determines the three-dimensional position and orientation of tibial, calcaneal and talar bones. The goal was to establish a quantitative database of the normal ranges of motion of the talocrural and subtalar joints. A clinical case on suspected subtalar instability demonstrated the relevance the proposed method.
METHODS: The range of motion was measured for the ankle joints in vivo for 20 subjects using the 3D CT stress-test. Motion of the tibia and calcaneus relative to the talus for eight extreme foot positions were described by helical parameters.
FINDINGS: High consistency for finite helical axis orientation (n) and rotation (theta) was shown for: talocrural extreme dorsiflexion to extreme plantarflexion (root mean square direction deviation (eta) 5.3 degrees and theta: SD 11.0 degrees), talorucral and subtalar extreme combined eversion-dorsiflexion to combined inversion-plantarflexion (eta: 6.7 degrees , theta: SD 9.0 degrees and eta:6.3 degrees , theta: SD 5.1 degrees), and subtalar extreme inversion to extreme eversion (eta: 6.4 degrees, theta: SD 5.9 degrees). Nearly all dorsi--and plantarflexion occurs in the talocrural joint (theta: mean 63.3 degrees (SD 11 degrees)). The inversion and internal rotation components for extreme eversion to inversion were approximately three times larger for the subtalar joint (theta: mean 22.9 degrees and 29.1 degrees) than for the talocrural joint (theta: mean 8.8 degrees and 10.7 degrees). Comparison of the ranges of motion of the pathologic ankle joint with the healthy subjects showed an increased inversion and axial rotation in the talocrural joint instead of in the suspected subtalar joint.
INTERPRETATION: The proposed diagnostic technique and the acquired database of helical parameters of ankle joint ranges of motion are suitable to apply in clinical cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19356831     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  4 in total

Review 1.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  How Do Hindfoot Fusions Affect Ankle Biomechanics: A Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Ian D Hutchinson; Josh R Baxter; Susannah Gilbert; MaCalus V Hogan; Jeff Ling; Stuart M Saunders; Hongsheng Wang; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effect of relative marker movement on the calculation of the foot torsion axis using a combined Cardan angle and helical axis approach.

Authors:  Eveline S Graf; Ian C Wright; Darren J Stefanyshyn
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  Biomechanics of the natural, arthritic, and replaced human ankle joint.

Authors:  Alberto Leardini; John J O'Connor; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.303

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.