Literature DB >> 19356429

Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area.

Arik Wolak1, Heidi Gransar, Louise E J Thomson, John D Friedman, Rory Hachamovitch, Ariel Gutstein, Leslee J Shaw, Donna Polk, Nathan D Wong, Rola Saouaf, Sean W Hayes, Alan Rozanski, Piotr J Slomka, Guido Germano, Daniel S Berman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine normal limits for ascending and descending thoracic aorta diameters in a large population of asymptomatic, low-risk adult subjects.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of aortic size is possible from gated noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans obtained for coronary calcium measurements. However, normal limits for aortic size by these studies have yet to be defined.
METHODS: In 4,039 adult patients undergoing coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning, systematic measurements of the ascending and descending thoracic aorta diameters were made at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to detect risk factors independently associated with ascending and descending thoracic aorta diameter and exclude subjects with these parameters from the final analysis. The final analysis groups for ascending and descending thoracic aorta included 2,952 and 1,931 subjects, respectively. Subjects were then regrouped by gender, age, and body surface area (BSA) for ascending and descending aorta, separately, and for each group, the mean, standard deviation, and upper normal limit were calculated for aortic diameter as well as for the calculated cross-sectional aortic area. Also, linear regression models were used to create BSA versus aortic diameter nomograms by age groups, and a formula for calculating predicted aortic size by age, gender, and BSA was created.
RESULTS: Age, BSA, gender, and hypertension were directly associated with thoracic aorta dimensions. Additionally, diabetes was associated with ascending aorta diameter, and smoking was associated with descending aorta diameter. The mean diameters for the final analysis group were 33 +/- 4 mm for the ascending and 24 +/- 3 mm for the descending thoracic aorta, respectively. The corresponding upper limits of normal diameters were 41 and 30 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal limits of ascending and descending aortic dimensions by noncontrast gated cardiac CT have been defined by age, gender, and BSA in a large, low-risk population of subjects undergoing CAC scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19356429     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  69 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of thoracic aortic disease.

Authors:  B J Holloway; D Rosewarne; R G Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Automated quantitative 3D analysis of aorta size, morphology, and mural calcification distributions.

Authors:  Sila Kurugol; Carolyn E Come; Alejandro A Diaz; James C Ross; Greg L Kinney; Jennifer L Black-Shinn; John E Hokanson; Matthew J Budoff; George R Washko; Raul San Jose Estepar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Pulse pressure relation to aortic and left ventricular structure in the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)-Reykjavik Study.

Authors:  Alyssa A Torjesen; Sigurður Sigurðsson; Jos J M Westenberg; John D Gotal; Vanessa Bell; Thor Aspelund; Lenore J Launer; Albert de Roos; Vilmundur Gudnason; Tamara B Harris; Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Extraction of open-state mitral valve geometry from CT volumes.

Authors:  Lennart Tautz; Mathias Neugebauer; Markus Hüllebrand; Katharina Vellguth; Franziska Degener; Simon Sündermann; Isaac Wamala; Leonid Goubergrits; Titus Kuehne; Volkmar Falk; Anja Hennemuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  The apex of the aortic arch backshifts with aging.

Authors:  N d'ostrevy; F D Ardellier; L Cassagnes; L Ouchchane; K Azarnoush; L Camilleri; L Sakka
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation.

Authors:  Erik T Bieging; Alex Frydrychowicz; Andrew Wentland; Benjamin R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Age-related changes in aortic 3D blood flow velocities and wall shear stress: Implications for the identification of altered hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Pim van Ooij; Julio Garcia; Wouter V Potters; S Chris Malaisrie; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Non-invasive in vivo measurement of cardiac output in C57BL/6 mice using high frequency transthoracic ultrasound: evaluation of gender and body weight effects.

Authors:  Elisabet Domínguez; Jesús Ruberte; José Ríos; Rosa Novellas; Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo; Marc Navarro; Yvonne Espada
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study).

Authors:  Ian S Rogers; Joseph M Massaro; Quynh A Truong; Amir A Mahabadi; Matthias F Kriegel; Caroline S Fox; George Thanassoulis; Eric M Isselbacher; Udo Hoffmann; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Can non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) triage patients suspected of having non-traumatic acute aortic syndromes (AAS)?

Authors:  Paul R Vantine; Jessica K Rosenblum; William G Schaeffer; Kevin T Williams; David W Dockray; Jeffrey M Levsky; Linda B Haramati; Loren H Ketai
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.