C F Hybels1, C F Pieper, D G Blazer. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. cfh@geri.duke.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms above screening thresholds have been shown to predict functional decline in older adults. Less is known about the impact of subthreshold depression, and whether more symptoms confer significantly greater risk compared to fewer symptoms. METHOD: Using data from the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE) collected over 10 years, we used repeated-measures mixed models to predict functional change by depression status at the prior (index) in-person interview. Depressive symptoms were measured using a modified version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Subthreshold depression was operationalized as 6-8 symptoms and CES-D-defined depression as 9-20 symptoms in the previous week. Three domains of functional status were assessed at the subsequent in-person interview: limitations in basic activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL) and mobility. RESULTS: Controlling for race, sex, age, education, marital status, cognitive status, health status, self-perceived health, perceived social support and functional status at the index interview, having 6 depressive symptoms predicted an increase of 0.12 IADL limitations 3-4 years later (p=0.03). The incremental effect of CES-D-defined depression (9 symptoms compared to 6-8 symptoms) was not significant, suggesting that the effect of more symptomatic depression did not add to that of subthreshold depression. CES-D score modeled as a continuous variable predicted functional change for all domains, but the relationship was not linear, supporting a possible threshold effect. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between depressive symptoms and functional change is complex, not necessarily linear, and may vary by tasks assessed.
BACKGROUND:Depressive symptoms above screening thresholds have been shown to predict functional decline in older adults. Less is known about the impact of subthreshold depression, and whether more symptoms confer significantly greater risk compared to fewer symptoms. METHOD: Using data from the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE) collected over 10 years, we used repeated-measures mixed models to predict functional change by depression status at the prior (index) in-person interview. Depressive symptoms were measured using a modified version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Subthreshold depression was operationalized as 6-8 symptoms and CES-D-defined depression as 9-20 symptoms in the previous week. Three domains of functional status were assessed at the subsequent in-person interview: limitations in basic activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL) and mobility. RESULTS: Controlling for race, sex, age, education, marital status, cognitive status, health status, self-perceived health, perceived social support and functional status at the index interview, having 6 depressive symptoms predicted an increase of 0.12 IADL limitations 3-4 years later (p=0.03). The incremental effect of CES-D-defined depression (9 symptoms compared to 6-8 symptoms) was not significant, suggesting that the effect of more symptomatic depression did not add to that of subthreshold depression. CES-D score modeled as a continuous variable predicted functional change for all domains, but the relationship was not linear, supporting a possible threshold effect. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between depressive symptoms and functional change is complex, not necessarily linear, and may vary by tasks assessed.
Authors: Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Adelita V Ranchor; Eric van Sonderen; Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld; Robbert Sanderman Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: E J Lenze; J C Rogers; L M Martire; B H Mulsant; B L Rollman; M A Dew; R Schulz; C F Reynolds Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Susan A Everson-Rose; Kimberly A Skarupski; Julia L Bienias; Robert S Wilson; Denis A Evans; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: L F Berkman; C S Berkman; S Kasl; D H Freeman; L Leo; A M Ostfeld; J Cornoni-Huntley; J A Brody Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1986-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: A Hajek; T Luck; C Brettschneider; T Posselt; C Lange; B Wiese; S Steinmann; S Weyerer; J Werle; M Pentzek; A Fuchs; J Stein; H Bickel; E Mösch; M Wagner; K Heser; W Maier; J M Scherer; S G Riedel-Heller; H-H König Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Aleezé S Moss; Diane K Reibel; Jeffrey M Greeson; Anjali Thapar; Rebecca Bubb; Jacqueline Salmon; Andrew B Newberg Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2014-12-09
Authors: A Cherubini; G Nisticò; R Rozzini; R Liperoti; M Di Bari; E Zampi; L Ferrannini; E Aguglia; L Pani; R Bernabei; N Marchionni; M Trabucchi Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Kenneth E Covinsky; Irena Stijacic Cenzer; Kristine Yaffe; Sarah O'Brien; Dan G Blazer Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 4.105