Literature DB >> 19353459

[Biomaterials in reconstructive skull base surgery].

W Maier1.   

Abstract

Reconstruction materials and techniques for the skull base have undergone rapid developments and differentiation in recent years. While mostly autotransplants, collagens or resorbable alloplastic materials are preferred for duraplasties, pronounced organ-specific differences can be observed IN the reconstruction of hard tissues. The use of polymethylmethacryl bone cement, once wide-spread, has decreased greatly due to the release of toxic monomers. Bony autotransplants are still used primarily for smaller skull-base defects, intraoperatively formable titanium meshes may be also used for larger fronto- or laterobasal reconstructions of bony defects. Defects in visible areas are increasingly closed with preformed titanium or ceramic implants, which are planned and fitted to the individual patient using preoperative CT imaging. At the skull base, this applies especially to reconstructions of the frontal sinus. For extensive reconstructions of the orbita, titanium meshes and non-resorbable plastics have proven valuable, in closing smaller defects especially of the orbital floor, resorbable implants based on Polyglactin 901 are also used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19353459     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1119507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  1 in total

1.  The transnasal approach to the skull base. From sinus surgery to skull base surgery.

Authors:  Martin Wagenmann; Jörg Schipper
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.