Literature DB >> 19353410

Twenty-four-hour and conventional blood pressure components and risk of preterm delivery or neonatal complications in gestational hypertension.

Marcin Liro1, Jerzy Gasowski, Dariusz Wydra, Tomasz Grodzicki, Janusz Emerich, Krzysztof Narkiewicz.   

Abstract

Gestational hypertension is a recognized risk factor for the development of complications during pregnancy. The present study retrospectively assessed the respective values of blood pressure components derived from conventional and 24-h recordings (ABPM) as predictors of premature delivery in women with gestational hypertension based on office readings from 26th week of gestation onwards. Blood pressures were measured conventionally and over 24 h. Standard medical and obstetric history, and standard laboratory work-up were taken into account. The mean (+/- standard deviation, SD) age of 123 women was 29 +/- 6 years. Current pregnancy was, on average, the second. The conventional systolic (SBP)/diastolic (DBP) blood pressure averaged 140 +/- 19/92 +/- 14 mmHg, and pulse pressure (PP) and mean arterial pressure (MBP) averaged 48 +/- 10 and 108 +/- 15 mmHg. The corresponding values derived from ABPM were 135 +/- 16/90 +/- 11, 47 +/- 9 and 105 +/- 12 mmHg. The 24-h blood pressures had better prognostic value than the conventional blood pressures. The 24-h SBP predicted risk of premature delivery and was inversely related to the duration of pregnancy and birth weight. After the exclusion of 41 women with white-coat hypertension, the highest predictive value was associated with PP. PP wider by 1SD was associated with 66% higher risk of premature delivery, and was associated with shortening of pregnancy by 2 weeks and 400 g lower birth weight, even after adjustment for SBP. In conclusion, ABPM is superior to conventional blood pressure measurements in predicting adverse outcome of pregnancy. Twenty-four-hour PP, of all classic indices, seems to be most closely related to increase of that risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19353410     DOI: 10.1080/08037050902836753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press        ISSN: 0803-7051            Impact factor:   2.835


  5 in total

1.  Ambulatory BP monitoring and clinic BP in predicting small-for-gestational-age infants during pregnancy.

Authors:  K Eguchi; T Ohmaru; A Ohkuchi; C Hirashima; K Takahashi; H Suzuki; K Kario; S Matsubara; Mitsuaki Suzuki
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Masked hypertension and neonatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Martin R Salazar; Walter G Espeche; Carlos E Leiva Sisnieguez; Paola L Juliano; María V Vulcano; Laura Sanchez Caro; Julián Minetto; Eduardo Balbín; Horacio A Carbajal
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 3.  Arterial stiffness, central hemodynamics, and cardiovascular risk in hypertension.

Authors:  Paolo Palatini; Edoardo Casiglia; Jerzy Gąsowski; Jerzy Głuszek; Piotr Jankowski; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Francesca Saladini; Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek; Valérie Tikhonoff; Luc Van Bortel; Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-12-07

4.  Blood Pressure Monitoring and Perinatal Outcomes in Normotensive Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Almudena Lara-Barea; Begoña Sánchez-Lechuga; Álvaro Vidal-Suárez; Ana I Arroba; Fernando Bugatto; Cristina López-Tinoco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Consistency among Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Values in Women with Chronic Hypertension and History of Eclampsia or Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ewa Wojciechowska; Piotr Sobieraj; Maciej Siński; Maria Anna Zaborska-Dworak; Piotr Gryglas; Jacek Lewandowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.