Literature DB >> 19353381

Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave.

Lena Hohwü1, Olof Akre, Knud Venborg Pedersen, Martin Jonsson, Claus Vinther Nielsen, Ove Gustafsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It remains uncertain whether the increased direct costs of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) are outweighed by cost savings due to shorter postoperative hospital care and shorter sick leave. This study compared the length of sick leave after RALP with that after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cohort study, information on length of sick leave was retrieved for 274 working men undergoing radical prostatectomy (127 RALP and 147 RRP). Data on confounders such as physical workload, average salary, body mass index and disease characteristics were collected from the medical records. Cox regression models were used to compare the treatment groups.
RESULTS: The median number of days with sick leave was 11 in the RALP group and 49 in the RRP group. After adjustment for confounders, patients in the RALP group were twice as likely to return to work at any time during follow-up (hazard ratio = 2.13, 95% confidence interval 1.62-2.80). High physical workload, low salary and high tumour grade were more common in the RRP group and associated with longer sick leave.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the RALP group had shorter postoperative hospital stay and less need for paid sick leave than patients in the RRP group. These data indicate that RALP shortens the convalescence. Part of this difference may, however, be attributable to different selection of patients and different a priori expectations among patients and their doctors. A prospective randomized study is advocated, although blinding is unfeasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19353381     DOI: 10.1080/00365590902834802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  10 in total

1.  Cost Analysis of Treatments for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Rachana Seelam; Julie C Lai; Janet M Hanley; J Stuart Wolf; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Ye Wang; Benjamin I Chung; Richard S Lee; Michael P Kurtz; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 4.  Does robotic prostatectomy meet its promise in the management of prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kuo-How Huang; Stacey C Carter; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Intelligent, Autonomous Machines in Surgery.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Amanda C Filiberto; Jeremy Balch; Alexander L Ayzengart; Patrick J Tighe; Parisa Rashidi; Azra Bihorac; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Physical activity before radical prostatectomy reduces sick leave after surgery - results from a prospective, non-randomized controlled clinical trial (LAPPRO).

Authors:  E Angenete; U Angerås; M Börjesson; J Ekelund; M Gellerstedt; T Thorsteinsdottir; G Steineck; E Haglind
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Simultaneous robotic low anterior resection and prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of rectum and prostate: initial case report.

Authors:  Myungchan Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Jae-Seung Chung; Sang Hyun Park; Seok San Park; Sung Jin Oh; Donghoon Lee; Koon Ho Rha; Cheol Kyu Oh
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-12

8.  Return to work in prostate cancer survivors - findings from a prospective study on occupational reintegration following a cancer rehabilitation program.

Authors:  Anneke Ullrich; Hilke Maria Rath; Ullrich Otto; Christa Kerschgens; Martin Raida; Christa Hagen-Aukamp; Corinna Bergelt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Relationships between perioperative physical activity and urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: an observational study.

Authors:  Sean F Mungovan; Bregtje P Huijbers; Andrew D Hirschhorn; Manish I Patel
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Duration of sick leave after active surveillance, surgery or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Plym; Mark Clements; Margaretha Voss; Lars Holmberg; Pär Stattin; Mats Lambe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.