S J Korzeniewski1, V Grigorescu, G Copeland, G Gu, K K Thoburn, J D Rogers, W I Young. 1. Division of Genomics, Perinatal Health and Chronic Disease Epidemiology Bureau of Epidemiology, Michigan Department of Community Health, 201 Capital View, 4-012, Lansing, MI 48906, USA. KorzeniewskiS@Michigan.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To match Michigan birth and newborn screening records to identify and follow-up potentially unscreened infants, assess data quality, and demonstrate the utility of Link Plus linkage software for matching MCH related administrative datasets. METHODS: Birth and newborn screening records maintained by the Michigan Department of Community Health from January 2007 through March 2008 were used in this study. Link Plus, a freely-available probabilistic record linkage software program developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was used to match records. Linkage performance was assessed by the linkage success rate (percentage of valid matches). Follow-up of un-matched records was conducted by the Michigan Newborn Screening Follow-up Program. RESULTS: Nearly all (99.2%) of the 142,178 birth records included in this study were successfully matched to newborn screening records. Following a transition to a web-based electronic birth certificate system and inclusion of a newborn screening card identification number on the birth record in 2008, the linkage success rate increased to 99.6% based on analysis of approximately 18,000 records. Of approximately 600 un-matched records, nearly half had received a newborn screen. Approximately 8% of un-matched records were due to parental refusal of newborn screening. Nine children received an initial screen as a result of this study; one was confirmed as having sickle cell trait. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that a freely available record linkage software, Link Plus, can be used to successfully match records of MCH databases thereby providing an opportunity for further research and quality assurance investigations.
OBJECTIVE: To match Michigan birth and newborn screening records to identify and follow-up potentially unscreened infants, assess data quality, and demonstrate the utility of Link Plus linkage software for matching MCH related administrative datasets. METHODS: Birth and newborn screening records maintained by the Michigan Department of Community Health from January 2007 through March 2008 were used in this study. Link Plus, a freely-available probabilistic record linkage software program developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was used to match records. Linkage performance was assessed by the linkage success rate (percentage of valid matches). Follow-up of un-matched records was conducted by the Michigan Newborn Screening Follow-up Program. RESULTS: Nearly all (99.2%) of the 142,178 birth records included in this study were successfully matched to newborn screening records. Following a transition to a web-based electronic birth certificate system and inclusion of a newborn screening card identification number on the birth record in 2008, the linkage success rate increased to 99.6% based on analysis of approximately 18,000 records. Of approximately 600 un-matched records, nearly half had received a newborn screen. Approximately 8% of un-matched records were due to parental refusal of newborn screening. Nine children received an initial screen as a result of this study; one was confirmed as having sickle cell trait. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that a freely available record linkage software, Link Plus, can be used to successfully match records of MCH databases thereby providing an opportunity for further research and quality assurance investigations.
Authors: Heather Angier; Rachel Gold; Courtney Crawford; Jean P O'Malley; Carrie J Tillotson; Miguel Marino; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2014-11
Authors: John M DePasquale; Karen Freeman; Minal M Amin; Sohyun Park; Samantha Rivers; Richard Hopkins; Michael J Cannon; Bonifacio Dy; Sheila C Dollard Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2012-02
Authors: Sarah L Reeves; Brian Madden; Meng Wu; Lauren S Miller; David Anders; Michele Caggana; Lindsay W Cogan; Mary Kleyn; Isabel Hurden; Gary L Freed; Kevin J Dombkowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah Reeves; Erika Garcia; Mary Kleyn; Michelle Housey; Robin Stottlemyer; Sarah Lyon-Callo; Kevin John Dombkowski Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Sarah L Reeves; Hannah K Jary; Jennifer P Gondhi; Mary Kleyn; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Kevin J Dombkowski Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Angela B Snyder; Mei Zhou; Rodney Theodore; Maa-Ohui Quarmyne; James Eckman; Peter A Lane Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Ying Wang; Joseph Kennedy; Michele Caggana; Regina Zimmerman; Sanil Thomas; John Berninger; Katharine Harris; Nancy S Green; Suzette Oyeku; Mary Hulihan; Althea M Grant; Scott D Grosse Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Naveed Zafar Janjua; Margot Kuo; Mei Chong; Amanda Yu; Maria Alvarez; Darrel Cook; Rosemary Armour; Ciaran Aiken; Karen Li; Seyed Ali Mussavi Rizi; Ryan Woods; David Godfrey; Jason Wong; Mark Gilbert; Mark W Tyndall; Mel Krajden Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240