Literature DB >> 19352656

Clinical evaluation of proximal row carpectomy revealed by follow-up for 10-29 years.

Ming Liu1, Haitao Zhou, Zhiming Yang, Fuguo Huang, Fuxing Pei, Zhou Xiang.   

Abstract

To investigate the long-term clinical results of proximal row carpectomy for treating chronic wrist injuries, we collected the postoperative results of ten patients who underwent this procedure between 1978 and 1996. The evaluation was based on Gartland and Werley and modified Green and O'Brien scoring systems. The follow-up ranged from ten to 29 years. Nine patients could perform daily activities properly, two experienced occasional pain and one moderate pain. Eight patients were rated as excellent, two were good, while none was fair or poor by the former scoring system. Seven patients were rated as good, three were fair and none was excellent or poor by the latter scoring system. No apparent degenerative change was found in the radiocapitate joints apart from a slight change in one patient. The operation is a dependable and durable procedure that results in satisfactory pain relief, improved functional wrist motion and grip strength, allowing most patients to resume their previous work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19352656      PMCID: PMC2899121          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0770-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

Review 1.  Proximal row carpectomy and intercarpal arthrodesis for the management of wrist arthritis.

Authors:  John D Wyrick
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Proximal row carpectomy: study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Michael L DiDonna; Thomas R Kiefhaber; Peter J Stern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Evaluation of healed Colles' fractures.

Authors:  J J GARTLAND; C W WERLEY
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1951-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Proximal-row carpectomy for diseases of the proximal row.

Authors:  A E Inglis; E C Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Proximal row carpectomy with partial capitate resection.

Authors:  G D Salomon; R G Eaton
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Long-term results following proximal row carpectomy.

Authors:  M M Tomaino; J Delsignore; R I Burton
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist.

Authors:  W P Cooney; R Bussey; J H Dobyns; R L Linscheid
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC-wrist) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC-wrist) in stage II.

Authors:  Andreas K Dacho; Steffen Baumeister; Guenter Germann; Michael Sauerbier
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Motion-preserving procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  J D Wyrick; P J Stern; T R Kiefhaber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Proximal row fusion as a solution for radiocarpal arthritis.

Authors:  A W Bach; E E Almquist; D M Newman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.230

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of proximal row carpectomy: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Steven L Moran
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2012-11

2.  Long-term outcomes of proximal row carpectomy: a minimum of 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mir H Ali; Marco Rizzo; Alexander Y Shin; Steven L Moran
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-11-04

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Assessment and Treatment in Kienböck's Disease.

Authors:  Karol Chojnowski; Mikołaj Opiełka; Miłosz Piotrowicz; Bartosz Kamil Sobocki; Justyna Napora; Filip Dąbrowski; Maciej Piotrowski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.