BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of sargramostim in Japanese patients with active Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active CD were enrolled. Step 1 was an open-label, phase 1 study of 2 microg/kg per day sargramostim administered subcutaneously (SC) for 4 weeks, with an optional 8-week extension with 6 microg/kg per day. Step 2 was an open-label, phase 1-2 study of the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of SC sargramostim 6 microg/kg per day over 4 weeks and of 8-week efficacy and safety. Efficacy variables were the proportion of patients achieving a clinical response [> or =100-point decrease from baseline in the CD activity index (CDAI)] and the proportion achieving clinical remission (CDAI < or = 150 points). RESULTS: Six patients participated in Step 1; five in Step 2. Serum concentrations of sargramostim peaked within 1 h of administration; mean terminal half-life was 2 h. Maximal serum concentrations increased with the dose. Mean accumulation ratios were 0.998 in Step 1 and 0.673 in Step 2. One of the six patients in the Step-1 extension and none of the five in Step 2 achieved a clinical response. Clinical remission was reported in one patient in each step. A notable decrease in median CDAI scores was observed in the extension and Step 2. In responders, improvement tended to be maintained through the 30-day follow-up. Drug-related adverse events included injection-site reaction, pyrexia, back pain, and bone pain. CONCLUSION: The systemic exposure of sargramostim increased dose-dependently. No accumulation in systemic exposure was associated with the repeated once-daily administration. SC sargramostim at 6 microg/kg per day improved median CDAI scores. A minority of patients experienced clinical remission or clinical response.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of sargramostim in Japanese patients with active Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS:Patients with moderately to severely active CD were enrolled. Step 1 was an open-label, phase 1 study of 2 microg/kg per day sargramostim administered subcutaneously (SC) for 4 weeks, with an optional 8-week extension with 6 microg/kg per day. Step 2 was an open-label, phase 1-2 study of the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of SC sargramostim 6 microg/kg per day over 4 weeks and of 8-week efficacy and safety. Efficacy variables were the proportion of patients achieving a clinical response [> or =100-point decrease from baseline in the CD activity index (CDAI)] and the proportion achieving clinical remission (CDAI < or = 150 points). RESULTS: Six patients participated in Step 1; five in Step 2. Serum concentrations of sargramostim peaked within 1 h of administration; mean terminal half-life was 2 h. Maximal serum concentrations increased with the dose. Mean accumulation ratios were 0.998 in Step 1 and 0.673 in Step 2. One of the six patients in the Step-1 extension and none of the five in Step 2 achieved a clinical response. Clinical remission was reported in one patient in each step. A notable decrease in median CDAI scores was observed in the extension and Step 2. In responders, improvement tended to be maintained through the 30-day follow-up. Drug-related adverse events included injection-site reaction, pyrexia, back pain, and bone pain. CONCLUSION: The systemic exposure of sargramostim increased dose-dependently. No accumulation in systemic exposure was associated with the repeated once-daily administration. SC sargramostim at 6 microg/kg per day improved median CDAI scores. A minority of patients experienced clinical remission or clinical response.
Authors: Joshua R Korzenik; Brian K Dieckgraefe; John F Valentine; Diana F Hausman; Mark J Gilbert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S E Jones; M W Schottstaedt; L A Duncan; R L Kirby; R H Good; R G Mennel; T K George; D A Snyder; D L Watkins; C A Denham; F A Hoyes; A S Rubin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Nemunaitis; C S Rosenfeld; R Ash; M H Freedman; H J Deeg; F Appelbaum; J W Singer; N Flomenberg; W Dalton; G J Elfenbein Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Jonathan I Goldstein; Douglas J Kominsky; Nicole Jacobson; Brittelle Bowers; Kirsten Regalia; Gregory L Austin; Melinda Yousefi; Michael T Falta; Andrew P Fontenot; Mark E Gerich; Lucy Golden-Mason; Sean P Colgan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Grace Gathungu; Mi-Ok Kim; John P Ferguson; Yashoda Sharma; Wei Zhang; Sok Meng E Ng; Erin Bonkowski; Kaida Ning; Lisa A Simms; Anthony R Croft; Joanne M Stempak; Nicole Walker; Ning Huang; Yang Xiao; Mark S Silverberg; Bruce Trapnell; Judy H Cho; Graham L Radford-Smith; Lee A Denson Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Kathryn Domanchuk; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Michael H Criqui; Lu Tian; Kiang Liu; Douglas Losordo; James Stein; David Green; Melina Kibbe; Lihui Zhao; Brian Annex; Harris Perlman; Donald Lloyd-Jones; William Pearce; Doris Taylor; Mary M McDermott Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Apostolos E Papalois; Calypso Barbatis; Dimosthenis Chrysikos; Maria Korontzi; Michail Sideris; Theodoros Pittaras; Eleni Triantafyllidi; Alexandros Nomikos; John K Triantafillidis Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 3.411