PURPOSE: High-frequency microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) tumors account for approximately 15% of colorectal cancers. Therapeutic decisions for colorectal cancer are empirically based and currently do not emphasize molecular subclassification despite an increasing collection of gene expression information. Our objective was to identify low molecular weight compounds with preferential activity against MSI colorectal cancers using combined gene expression data sets. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three expression/query signatures (discovery data set) characterizing MSI-H colorectal cancer were matched with information derived from changes induced in cell lines by 164 compounds using the systems biology tool "Connectivity Map." A series of sequential filtering and ranking algorithms were used to select the candidate compounds. Compounds were validated using two additional expression/query signatures (validation data set). Cytotoxic, cell cycle, and apoptosis effects of validated compounds were evaluated in a panel of cell lines. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 164 compounds were validated as targeting MSI-H cell lines using the bioinformatics approach; rapamycin, LY-294002, 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, and trichostatin A were the most robust candidate compounds. In vitro results showed that MSI-H cell lines due to hypermethylation of MLH1 are preferentially targeted by rapamycin (18.3 versus 4.4 mumol/L; P = 0.0824) and LY-294002 (15.02 versus 10.37 mumol/L; P = 0.0385) when compared with microsatellite-stable cells. Preferential activity was also observed in MSH2 and MSH6 mutant cells. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is of special relevance in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. In addition, we show that amalgamation of gene expression information across studies provides a robust approach for selection of potential therapies corresponding to specific groups of patients.
PURPOSE: High-frequency microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) tumors account for approximately 15% of colorectal cancers. Therapeutic decisions for colorectal cancer are empirically based and currently do not emphasize molecular subclassification despite an increasing collection of gene expression information. Our objective was to identify low molecular weight compounds with preferential activity against MSI colorectal cancers using combined gene expression data sets. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three expression/query signatures (discovery data set) characterizing MSI-H colorectal cancer were matched with information derived from changes induced in cell lines by 164 compounds using the systems biology tool "Connectivity Map." A series of sequential filtering and ranking algorithms were used to select the candidate compounds. Compounds were validated using two additional expression/query signatures (validation data set). Cytotoxic, cell cycle, and apoptosis effects of validated compounds were evaluated in a panel of cell lines. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 164 compounds were validated as targeting MSI-H cell lines using the bioinformatics approach; rapamycin, LY-294002, 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, and trichostatin A were the most robust candidate compounds. In vitro results showed that MSI-H cell lines due to hypermethylation of MLH1 are preferentially targeted by rapamycin (18.3 versus 4.4 mumol/L; P = 0.0824) and LY-294002 (15.02 versus 10.37 mumol/L; P = 0.0385) when compared with microsatellite-stable cells. Preferential activity was also observed in MSH2 and MSH6 mutant cells. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is of special relevance in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. In addition, we show that amalgamation of gene expression information across studies provides a robust approach for selection of potential therapies corresponding to specific groups of patients.
Authors: Haley Hieronymus; Justin Lamb; Kenneth N Ross; Xiao P Peng; Cristina Clement; Anna Rodina; Maria Nieto; Jinyan Du; Kimberly Stegmaier; Srilakshmi M Raj; Katherine N Maloney; Jon Clardy; William C Hahn; Gabriela Chiosis; Todd R Golub Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Holly K Dressman; Andrew Berchuck; Gina Chan; Jun Zhai; Andrea Bild; Robyn Sayer; Janiel Cragun; Jennifer Clarke; Regina S Whitaker; Lihua Li; Jonathan Gray; Jeffrey Marks; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Anil Potti; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins; Johnathan M Lancaster Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joel K Greenson; Joseph D Bonner; Ofer Ben-Yzhak; Hector I Cohen; Ines Miselevich; Murray B Resnick; Philippe Trougouboff; Lynn D Tomsho; Evelyn Kim; Marcelo Low; Ronit Almog; Gad Rennert; Stephen B Gruber Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: A J Philp; I G Campbell; C Leet; E Vincan; S P Rockman; R H Whitehead; R J Thomas; W A Phillips Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jennifer B Goldstein; William Wu; Ester Borras; Gita Masand; Amanda Cuddy; Maureen E Mork; Sarah A Bannon; Patrick M Lynch; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Melissa W Taggart; Ji Wu; Paul Scheet; Scott Kopetz; Y Nancy You; Eduardo Vilar Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 12.531