Literature DB >> 19350669

The role of cytomorphology and proliferative activity in predicting biologic behavior of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a study by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Paschalis Chatzipantelis1, Panagiotis Konstantinou, Michalis Kaklamanos, George Apostolou, Charitini Salla.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The biologic behavior of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is difficult to predict in the absence of metastases or invasion into adjacent organs. In this study, the authors retrospectively evaluated the cytopathology and proliferative activity in cytology specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA).
METHODS: Thirty-five patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic NET based on EUS-guided FNA were studied retrospectively (2002-2007). Cytopathology and proliferative activity (Ki-67) in cytology specimens were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (all patients with simultaneous, suspicious, metastatic masses [unresectable tumors]) and Group B (patients with final histopathologic diagnosis). Moreover, the patients in Group B were classified into 4 risk subgroups according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) classification (Subgroups 1a, 1b, 2, and 3).
RESULTS: Thirteen of 35 patients who were diagnosed with unequivocally malignant tumors were placed in Group A (unresectable tumors), and 22 of 35 patients were placed in Group B. In Group A, >2% Ki-67-positive cells were present in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%). In Group B, >2% Ki-67-positive cells were present in 0 of 6 patients in WHO Subgroup 1a (0%), in 3 of 7 patients in WHO Subgroup 1b (42.86%), in 7 of 7 patients in WHO Subgroup 2 (100%), and in 2 of 2 patients in WHO Subgroup 3 (100%). In Group A, nuclear pleomorphism/multinucleation was observed in 8 or 13 patients (61.53%). In Group B, nuclear pleomorphism/multinucleation was observed in 4 of 7 patients in WHO Subgroup 2 (57.14%) and in 2 of 2 patients in WHO Subgroup 3 (100%). In Group A, nucleoli were present in 7 of 13 patients (53.85%); whereas, in Group B, nucleoli were present in 6 of 7 patients in WHO Subgroup 2 (85.7%) and in 2 of 2 patients in WHO Subgroup 3 (100%). None of the remaining cytologic features that were evaluated (necrosis, mitoses, spindle cells, and molding/crush artifact) were observed consistently in malignant NETs.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that Ki-67 evaluation in routine EUS-FNA cytology specimens can be used as a potential prognostic marker in pancreatic NETs. Nuclear pleomorphism/multinucleation and the presence of nucleoli also are reliable for predicting malignant pancreatic NETs. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350669     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  Correlation of Ki-67 indices from biopsy and resection specimens of neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  J Barnes; S J Johnson; J J French
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors: a 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT diagnostic study.

Authors:  Angela Spanu; Orazio Schillaci; Bastiana Piras; Diego F Calvisi; Antonio Falchi; Roberta Danieli; Susanna Nuvoli; Franca Dore; Giuseppe Madeddu
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 3.  Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Wataru Kimura; Koji Tezuka; Ichiro Hirai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor accompanied with multiple liver metastases.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Kyoichi Takaori; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-27

5.  Analysis of lymph node metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) based on the tumor size and hormonal production.

Authors:  Kosuke Tsutsumi; Takao Ohtsuka; Yasuhisa Mori; Minoru Fujino; Takaharu Yasui; Shinichi Aishima; Shunichi Takahata; Masafumi Nakamura; Tetsuhide Ito; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Grading of EUS-FNA cytologic specimens from patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: it is time move to tissue core biopsy?

Authors:  Rakesh Vinayek; Gabriele Capurso; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

7.  Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors <2 cm on preoperative imaging are associated with a low incidence of nodal metastasis and an excellent overall survival.

Authors:  Paul A Toste; Brian E Kadera; Sergei F Tatishchev; David W Dawson; Barbara M Clerkin; Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra Watson; James S Tomlinson; Oscar J Hines; Howard A Reber; Timothy R Donahue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Reliability of Ki-67 Determination in FNA Samples for Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Cristina Díaz Del Arco; J Ángel Díaz Pérez; Luis Ortega Medina; Javier Sastre Valera; M Jesús Fernández Aceñero
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Cytopathological evaluation of potential malignancy of duodenal gastrinoma using aspiration smears from two patients' resected tumors (NET G1, NET G2): A case report.

Authors:  Hirotaka Noda; Kazuyoshi Masuda; Masami Kanbara; Hiromi Maeda; Tadao K Kobayashi; Chikao Yutani
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-10

Review 10.  Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma with signet-ring cells of the pancreas: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kiichiro Kaji; Jun Seishima; Masatoshi Yamato; Masaki Miyazawa; Takuya Komura; Yohei Marukawa; Hajime Ohta; Satomi Kasashima; Atsuhiro Kawashima; Masaaki Yano; Masashi Unoura
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.