Literature DB >> 19350399

Estimation of absolute fracture risk among middle-aged and older men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk population cohort study.

Alireza Moayyeri1, Stephen Kaptoge, Robert N Luben, Nicholas J Wareham, Sheila Bingham, Jonathan Reeve, Kay Tee Khaw.   

Abstract

While estimates of relative risks associated with risk factors such as age and bone mineral density (BMD) may be of interest for etiologic and comparative purposes, clinical questions such as who might benefit most from preventive interventions or BMD monitoring depend on estimates of absolute fracture risk. The European prospective investigation into cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk study included 25,311 participants (11,476 men) aged 4,079 years in 1993-1997. All participants were followed for osteoporotic fractures to March 2007. Ten-year absolute risk of fracture in men and women were calculated using the baseline survivor function in multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models adjusting for age, sex, history of fractures, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol intake. In comparison of those without history of fracture versus those with history of fracture, the 10-year absolute risk of any fracture in men ranged from 1.0 vs. 1.2% at age 40 years to 3.0 vs. 4.4% at age 75 years. The respective estimates in women ranged from 0.7 vs. 1.0% at age 40 years to 9.3 vs. 17.2% at age 75 years. Statistically significant interaction between age and sex was found (P < 0.001), which contributed to the differences in predicted absolute fracture risks for men and women at different ages. Our study shows the need for population-specific data to develop efficient well calibrated algorithms for assessment of fracture risk. The interaction observed between sex and age points to the need for further prospective studies among men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19350399     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9337-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  28 in total

1.  EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.

Authors:  N Day; S Oakes; R Luben; K T Khaw; S Bingham; A Welch; N Wareham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  International variation in the incidence of hip fractures: cross-national project on osteoporosis for the World Health Organization Program for Research on Aging.

Authors:  A V Schwartz; J L Kelsey; S Maggi; M Tuttleman; S C Ho; P V Jónsson; G Poór; J A Sisson de Castro; L Xu; C C Matkin; L M Nelson; S P Heyse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Simple computer model for calculating and reporting 5-year osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Bruce Ettinger; Teresa A Hillier; Alice Pressman; Maggie Che; David A Hanley
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Epidemiology and public health impact of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Cooper
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1993-10

Review 5.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; H Sievänen; A Heinonen; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; D B Pryor; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Contribution of clinical risk factors to bone density-based absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  W D Leslie; C Metge; L Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The impact of the use of multiple risk indicators for fracture on case-finding strategies: a mathematical approach.

Authors:  Chris De Laet; Anders Odén; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jönsson; John A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Shanghai Changfeng Study: a community-based prospective cohort study of chronic diseases among middle-aged and elderly: objectives and design.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Albert Hofman; Yu Hu; Huandong Lin; Chouwen Zhu; Johannes Jeekel; Xuejuan Jin; Jiyao Wang; Jian Gao; Yiqing Yin; Naiqing Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Effect of Testosterone Treatment on Volumetric Bone Density and Strength in Older Men With Low Testosterone: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peter J Snyder; David L Kopperdahl; Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Susan S Ellenberg; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Cora E Lewis; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Ann V Schwartz; David C Lee; Shalender Bhasin; Glenn R Cunningham; Thomas M Gill; Alvin M Matsumoto; Ronald S Swerdloff; Shehzad Basaria; Susan J Diem; Christina Wang; Xiaoling Hou; Denise Cifelli; Darlene Dougar; Bret Zeldow; Douglas C Bauer; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Vitamin D insufficiency and bone fractures in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Cs Ambrus; Cs Almasi; K Berta; Gy Deak; A Marton; M Zs Molnar; Zs Nemeth; Cs Horvath; P Lakatos; M Szathmari; I Mucsi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Exercise prescription after fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review.

Authors:  L M Feehan; C A Beck; S R Harris; D L MacIntyre; L C Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Smoking and fracture risk in men: a meta-analysis of cohort studies, using both frequentist and Bayesian approaches.

Authors:  Yingke Xu; Yueyang Bao; Megan Wang; Qing Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  New studies, technology, and the progress of epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cock M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Harry L A Janssen; Caroline C W Klaver; Ernst J Kuipers; Tamar E C Nijsten; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Body height in adult women and men in a cross-sectional population-based survey in Geneva: temporal trends, association with general health status and height loss after age 50.

Authors:  Julia Schäppi; Silvia Stringhini; Idris Guessous; Kaspar Staub; Katarina L Matthes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 10.  Behavioural Risk Factors in Mid-Life Associated with Successful Ageing, Disability, Dementia and Frailty in Later Life: A Rapid Systematic Review.

Authors:  Louise Lafortune; Steven Martin; Sarah Kelly; Isla Kuhn; Olivia Remes; Andy Cowan; Carol Brayne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.