OBJECTIVES: To determine how equitable enrolment and utilization of community-based health insurance is in two communities with varying levels of success in implementing the scheme. METHODS: The study was undertaken in two communities in Anambra state, southeast Nigeria. Data was collected using a questionnaire that was administered to 971 respondents in two communities selected by simple random sampling. Data analysis examined socio-economic status (SES) differences in enrolment levels, utilization, willingness to renew registration and payments. RESULTS: Enrolment level was 15.5% in the non-successful community and 48.4% in the successful community (p<0.0001). However, there was no inequity in enrolment, willingness to renew registration and utilization of services. Equal amounts of money were paid as registration fee and premium by all SES quartiles. There were no exemptions and no subsidies. CONCLUSION: Enrolment was generally low and contributions were retrogressive. The average premiums were also small. However, there was equitable enrolment and utilization of services. Efforts need to be made to increase the number of enrolees, so as to increase the pool of funds and risks. Payments by enrolees especially in poor and rural communities should be supplemented by subsidies from government and donors in order to ensure equitable financial risk protection.
OBJECTIVES: To determine how equitable enrolment and utilization of community-based health insurance is in two communities with varying levels of success in implementing the scheme. METHODS: The study was undertaken in two communities in Anambra state, southeast Nigeria. Data was collected using a questionnaire that was administered to 971 respondents in two communities selected by simple random sampling. Data analysis examined socio-economic status (SES) differences in enrolment levels, utilization, willingness to renew registration and payments. RESULTS: Enrolment level was 15.5% in the non-successful community and 48.4% in the successful community (p<0.0001). However, there was no inequity in enrolment, willingness to renew registration and utilization of services. Equal amounts of money were paid as registration fee and premium by all SES quartiles. There were no exemptions and no subsidies. CONCLUSION: Enrolment was generally low and contributions were retrogressive. The average premiums were also small. However, there was equitable enrolment and utilization of services. Efforts need to be made to increase the number of enrolees, so as to increase the pool of funds and risks. Payments by enrolees especially in poor and rural communities should be supplemented by subsidies from government and donors in order to ensure equitable financial risk protection.
Authors: Chunling Lu; Iván Mejía-Guevara; Kenneth Hill; Paul Farmer; S V Subramanian; Agnes Binagwaho Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Samuel Aborah; Patricia Akweongo; Martin Adjuik; Roger A Atinga; Paul Welaga; Philip B Adongo Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Gabriela B Gomez; Nicola Foster; Daniella Brals; Heleen E Nelissen; Oladimeji A Bolarinwa; Marleen E Hendriks; Alexander C Boers; Diederik van Eck; Nicole Rosendaal; Peju Adenusi; Kayode Agbede; Tanimola M Akande; Michael Boele van Hensbroek; Ferdinand W Wit; Catherine A Hankins; Constance Schultsz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Valéry Ridde; Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay; Aurélia Souares; Julia Lohmann; David Zombré; Jean Louis Koulidiati; Maurice Yaogo; Hervé Hien; Matthew Hunt; Sylvie Zongo; Manuela De Allegri Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: David Mark Dror; S A Shahed Hossain; Atanu Majumdar; Tracey Lynn Pérez Koehlmoos; Denny John; Pradeep Kumar Panda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240