OBJECTIVES: Even when health insurance coverage is available, health policies may not be effective at increasing coverage among vulnerable populations. New approaches are needed to improve access to care. We experimentally introduced a novel intervention that uses Policy Navigators to increase health insurance enrollment in a poor population. METHODS: We used data from the Quality Improvement Demonstration Study (QIDS), a randomized experiment taking place at the district level in the Visayas region of the Philippines. In two arms of the study, we compared the effects of introducing Policy Navigators to controls. The Policy Navigators advocated for improved access to care by providing regular system-level expertise directly to the policy-makers, municipal mayors and governors responsible for paying for and enrolling poor households into the health insurance program. Using regression models, we compared levels of enrollment in our intervention versus control sites. We also assessed the cost-effectiveness of marginal increases in enrollment. RESULTS: We found that Policy Navigators improved enrollment in health insurance between 39% and 102% compared to the controls. Policy navigators were cost-effective at 0.86 USD per enrollee. However, supplementary national government campaigns, which were implemented to further increase coverage, attenuated normal enrollment efforts. CONCLUSION:Policy Navigators appear to be effective in improving access to care and their success underscores the importance of local-level strategies for improving enrollment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Even when health insurance coverage is available, health policies may not be effective at increasing coverage among vulnerable populations. New approaches are needed to improve access to care. We experimentally introduced a novel intervention that uses Policy Navigators to increase health insurance enrollment in a poor population. METHODS: We used data from the Quality Improvement Demonstration Study (QIDS), a randomized experiment taking place at the district level in the Visayas region of the Philippines. In two arms of the study, we compared the effects of introducing Policy Navigators to controls. The Policy Navigators advocated for improved access to care by providing regular system-level expertise directly to the policy-makers, municipal mayors and governors responsible for paying for and enrolling poor households into the health insurance program. Using regression models, we compared levels of enrollment in our intervention versus control sites. We also assessed the cost-effectiveness of marginal increases in enrollment. RESULTS: We found that Policy Navigators improved enrollment in health insurance between 39% and 102% compared to the controls. Policy navigators were cost-effective at 0.86 USD per enrollee. However, supplementary national government campaigns, which were implemented to further increase coverage, attenuated normal enrollment efforts. CONCLUSION: Policy Navigators appear to be effective in improving access to care and their success underscores the importance of local-level strategies for improving enrollment.
Authors: Tu-Uyen Ngoc Nguyen; Sora Park Tanjasiri; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Jacqueline H Tran; Mary Anne Foo Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2006-12-13
Authors: Konrad Obermann; Matthew R Jowett; Maria Ofelia O Alcantara; Eduardo P Banzon; Claude Bodart Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2006-01-06 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: John W Peabody; Stella Quimbo; Jhiedon Florentino; Riti Shimkhada; Xylee Javier; David Paculdo; Dean Jamison; Orville Solon Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.344