Literature DB >> 19347832

EGFR mutations are detected comparably in cytologic and surgical pathology specimens of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Jason H Smouse1, Edmund S Cibas, Pasi A Jänne, Victoria A Joshi, Kelly H Zou, Neal I Lindeman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are present in approximately 10% of nonsmall cell lung cancers, and higher in never-smokers, women, and Asians. Small in-frame deletions in exon 19 ( approximately 45%) and L858R mutation in exon 21 ( approximately 40%) predict response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, whereas some others herald resistance. Direct sequencing of tumor DNA detects all EGFR mutations, but is limited by interference from nonmalignant cells within the samples. Concern over such interference has discouraged testing cytologic samples, but the adequacy of cytologic specimens for EGFR sequencing has not been studied.
METHODS: EGFR sequencing of surgical and cytologic specimens at Brigham and Women's Hospital over the past 2 years was reviewed. Of 239 specimens, 227 (95%) were surgical, and 12 (5%) were cytologic (fine needle aspirations, pleural fluids, bronchial washings, and bronchoalveolar lavages).
RESULTS: Sixty-three (28%) surgical specimens showed EGFR mutations, whereas 143 (63%) were negative, 8 (3.5%) failed, and 14 (6.2%) were inconclusive (negative result in a heterogeneous sample). Seven (58%) cytologic specimens showed EGFR mutations, whereas 4 (33%) were negative, and 1 (8.3%) was inconclusive. Cytologic specimens were more likely to have a mutation than surgical specimens (P = .02). There was no significant difference in the frequency of inconclusive results.
CONCLUSIONS: Cytologic specimens are suitable for EGFR sequencing and show comparable sensitivity for mutation detection as compared with surgical specimens. The suitability of a sample should be determined on a case-by-case basis, and cytologic samples should not be dismissed as inadequate without a thorough review. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19347832     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  39 in total

1.  Concurrent fine needle aspirations and core needle biopsies: a comparative study of substrates for next-generation sequencing in solid organ malignancies.

Authors:  Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Hui Chen; Rajesh R Singh; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Jawad Manekia; Bedia A Barkoh; Hui Yao; Sharjeel Sabir; Russell R Broaddus; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Gregg Staerkel; John Stewart; Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  The suitability of small biopsy and cytology specimens for EGFR and other mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shu Wang; Bing Yu; Chiu Chin Ng; Belinda Mercorella; Christina I Selinger; Sandra A O'Toole; Wendy A Cooper
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04

3.  ARMS for EGFR mutation analysis of cytologic and corresponding lung adenocarcinoma histologic specimens.

Authors:  Jinguo Liu; Ruiying Zhao; Jie Zhang; Jian Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Role of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of free circulating DNA in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paola Ulivi; Rosella Silvestrini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.730

5.  ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Testing in Practice.

Authors:  Mary Beth Beasley; Daniel T Milton
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor and K-ras mutation status in cytological stained smears of non-small cell lung cancer patients: correlation with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Maria D Lozano; Javier J Zulueta; Jose I Echeveste; Alfonso Gúrpide; Luis M Seijo; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Anabel Del Barrio; Ruben Pio; Miguel Angel Idoate; Tania Labiano; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-14

7.  Molecular Testing in EBUS-TBNA Specimens of Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Study of Concordance Between Cell Block Method and Liquid-Based Cytology in Appraising Sample Cellularity and EGFR Mutations.

Authors:  Daniele Magnini; Leonello Fuso; Francesco Varone; Ettore D'Argento; Maurizio Martini; Antonietta Pecoriello; Vincenzo Di Noia; Damiano Arciuolo; Guido Fadda; Guido Rindi; Luca Richeldi
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization to detect EGFR gene copy number in cell blocks from fine-needle aspirates of non small cell lung carcinomas and lung metastases from colo-rectal cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Simone; Anita Mangia; Andrea Malfettone; Vincenza Rubini; Michele Siciliano; Anna Di Benedetto; Irene Terrenato; Flavia Novelli; Marcella Mottolese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-15

Review 9.  EGFR mutation testing on cytological and histological samples in non-small cell lung cancer: a Polish, single institution study and systematic review of European incidence.

Authors:  Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz; Włodzimierz T Olszewski; Andrzej Tysarowski; Dariusz M Kowalski; Maciej Głogowski; Maciej Krzakowski; Janusz A Siedlecki; Michał Wągrodzki; Monika Prochorec-Sobieszek
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-11-15

10.  microRNA expression profiles associated with survival, disease progression, and response to gefitinib in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dongfang Tang; Ruyong Yao; Mingzhao Wang; Yongjie Wang; Yasai Yao; Xiaoxiao Li; Haiping Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.