Literature DB >> 19347413

Ten-year results of an inset biconvex patella prosthesis in primary knee arthroplasty.

Sani Erak1, Vaishnav Rajgopal, Steven J Macdonald, Richard W McCalden, Robert B Bourne.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The inset biconvex patella component is an alternative form of patella resurfacing in knee arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed 433 patients in whom 521 patella prostheses were implanted before April 1997 to determine survivorship, factors associated with failure of the implant, incidence of anterior knee pain, and factors that may be associated with the latter. We had clinical results for 204 surviving patients (242 knees) without failure of their implants with a minimum 10-year followup (mean, 11.4 years; range, 10-17 years). For the remaining 229 patients we used chart or radiographic review to determine if failure of their implant or other complications had occurred. At latest followup, 14 patella components had been revised for aseptic reasons or were radiographically loose. The 10-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship for the entire cohort for aseptic failure was 97.0%. Aseptic failure of the patella component was associated with the presence of osteonecrosis and the absence of a superior rim of bone radiographically. The incidence of anterior knee pain in surviving patients without failure of their implants was 7.8%. No factor examined was associated with anterior knee pain. Survivorship and clinical and radiographic results are equivalent, but not clearly superior, to those reported for other forms of patella resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19347413      PMCID: PMC2690758          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0816-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  43 in total

1.  The effect of built-in external femoral rotation on patellofemoral tracking in the genesis II total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B P Kaper; M Woolfrey; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The Genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year followup study.

Authors:  R S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The failure of all-polyethylene patellar components in total knee replacement.

Authors:  M E Berend; M A Ritter; E M Keating; P M Faris; B M Crites
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Metal-backed patellar components: a brief report on 10-year survival.

Authors:  B M Crites; M E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up.

Authors:  David J Rodricks; Shantanu Patil; Pamela Pulido; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  D G Campbell; W W Duncan; M Ashworth; A Mintz; J Stirling; L Wakefield; T M Stevenson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

7.  Total knee replacement with and without patellar resurfacing: a prospective, randomised trial using the profix total knee system.

Authors:  A J Smith; D J Wood; M-G Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-01

8.  The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Michael B Vessely; Andrew L Whaley; W Scott Harmsen; Cathy D Schleck; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fixation strength comparison of onlay and inset patellar implants.

Authors:  Alexander D Rosenstein; Paul D Postak; A Seth Greenwald
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Predicting patellar failure after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; Mark D Fish; Michael E Berend; Merrill A Ritter; E Michael Keating
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [The third compartment in knee endoprosthetics: from denervation to replacement, which therapy is correct?].

Authors:  C Stärke; E F Röpke; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  No difference in patellar position between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Felipe Galvão A de Abreu; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Romain Gaillard; Philippe Neyret; Sebastien Lustig; Elvire Servien
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Determinants of anterior knee pain following total knee replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Joost M Reuver; Eduard L Mutsaerts; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterior knee pain after a total knee arthroplasty: What can cause this pain?

Authors:  Stéfanus Jacob Martinus Breugem; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

5.  Patella position is not a determinant for anterior knee pain 10 years after balanced gap total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Albert H van Houten; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty : Causes, diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  R Michalik; B Rath; H-R Springorum; C Lüring; M Tingart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.