Literature DB >> 19346963

Diffusion-weighted imaging as predictor of therapy response in an animal model of Ewing sarcoma.

Wilfried Reichardt1, Eva Juettner, Markus Uhl, Dominik V Elverfeldt, Udo Kontny.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for monitoring dose-dependent tumor response in a mouse-xenograft model of Ewing sarcoma after administration of treosulfan in different dosages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ewing sarcoma implanted orthotopically into the left thigh of non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice were evaluated with a 9.4 T MR unit by using a specific mouse whole body coil. Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences, and transverse echo-planar DWI examinations were performed at baseline, 24 hours and 72 hours after intraperitoneal injection of treosulfan in 2 different doses. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the viable parts of the tumor was automatically calculated from DWI imaging findings. These findings were correlated with histopathologic results at each time point. Volumetric measurements were performed by summing up the regions of interest in consecutive slices.
RESULTS: T1- and T2-weighted images before administration of treosulfan showed viable tumor tissue with small necrotic areas. At 24 hours after treosulfan injection, a significantly higher increase in ADC in the viable parts of the tumor could be observed in tumors of mice that had been injected with the higher dose of treosulfan compared with mice injected with the lower dose treosulfan, whereas no significant volumetric differences between the 2 different doses could be observed. Seventy-two hours after injection of treosulfan the ADC values in the viable parts of the tumor of mice treated with the high dose of treosulfan further increased and the tumor volume in the high-dose group was now significantly lower than in the low-dose group.
CONCLUSION: Compared with volumetric measurements, DWI of the viable tumor parts could be used to discriminate between the effects of 2 different dosages at an earlier time point than volumetric measurements in an animal model in vivo. This method could be especially useful for monitoring drug effects in phase I/II clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19346963     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819dcc84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  12 in total

Review 1.  Whole-body MR imaging, bone diffusion imaging: how and why?

Authors:  Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging: a potential tool in assessing the addition of hyperthermia to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Oana I Craciunescu; Donald E Thrall; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 3.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diffusion MRI with Semi-Automated Segmentation Can Serve as a Restricted Predictive Biomarker of the Therapeutic Response of Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Renu M Stephen; Abhinav K Jha; Denise J Roe; Theodore P Trouard; Jean-Philippe Galons; Matthew A Kupinski; Georgette Frey; Haiyan Cui; Scott Squire; Mark D Pagel; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Robert J Gillies; Alison T Stopeck
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  [Postoperative and posttherapeutic changes after primary bone tumors : What's important for radiologists?]

Authors:  T Grieser; I-M Nöbauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  A micro-imaging study linking bone cancer pain with tumor growth and bone resorption in a rat model.

Authors:  Louis Doré-Savard; Nicolas Beaudet; Luc Tremblay; Yongjun Xiao; Martin Lepage; Philippe Sarret
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 7.  High-field small animal magnetic resonance oncology studies.

Authors:  Louisa Bokacheva; Ellen Ackerstaff; H Carl LeKaye; Kristen Zakian; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Correlation between equivalent cross-relaxation rate and cellular density in soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Shunsuke Hamada; Shigeru Matsushima; Hideshi Sugiura; Kenji Yamada; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Ewing sarcoma dissemination and response to T-cell therapy in mice assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  L Liebsch; S Kailayangiri; L Beck; B Altvater; R Koch; C Dierkes; M Hotfilder; N Nagelmann; C Faber; H Kooijman; J Ring; V Vieth; C Rossig
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prediction of early response to chemotherapy in lung cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Weidong Li; Zhang Zhang; Tielian Yu; Dong Li
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.