Literature DB >> 19346816

Patient selection for phase II trials.

Guru Sonpavde1, Matthew D Galsky, Thomas E Hutson, Daniel D Von Hoff.   

Abstract

The standard phase II trial design yields disparate results with similar regimens owing, in part, to variable patient populations enrolled, and appears to be a poor indicator of efficacy demonstrable in a phase III trial. While other phase II trial designs attempt to rectify this problem including the randomized phase II trial and randomized discontinuation trial, they demand more resources and a larger number of patients and are not definitive. A paradigm of multicenter straight phase II trials with rigorous attention to patient selection criteria to improve the validity and reproducibility of results is proposed. Such trials may be superior guides to select regimens for further development than trials that are single-center based with favorable populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19346816     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318172dccd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  3 in total

1.  Shortcomings in the clinical evaluation of new drugs: acute myeloid leukemia as paradigm.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Martin S Tallman; Noel S Weiss; Richard A Larson; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Moving molecular targeted drug therapy towards personalized medicine: issues related to clinical trial design.

Authors:  Jaap Verweij; Maja de Jonge; Ferry Eskens; Stefan Sleijfer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  New results will change the paradigm for phase I trials and drug approval.

Authors:  Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-10-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.