Literature DB >> 19346535

The Japanese guideline for prostate cancer screening.

Chisato Hamashima1, Tomio Nakayama, Motoyasu Sagawa, Hiroshi Saito, Tomotaka Sobue.   

Abstract

In 2005, there were 9264 deaths from prostate cancer, accounting for 4.7% of the total number of cancer deaths in Japan. As the population continues to age, interest in prostate cancer screening has increased, and opportunistic screening for prostate cancer has been conducted worldwide. The guideline for prostate cancer screening was developed based on the established method. The efficacies of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) were evaluated. Based on the balance of the benefits and harms, recommendations for population-based and opportunistic screening were formulated. Two methods of prostate cancer screening were evaluated. Based on the analytic framework involving key questions, 1186 articles published from January 1985 to October 2006 were selected using MEDLINE and other methods. After the systematic literature review, 28 articles were identified as providing evidence of mortality reduction from prostate cancer, including 5 observational studies for DRE screening, 1 meta-analysis, 3 randomized controlled trials and 19 observational studies for PSA screening. Although several studies showed that PSA screening had a beneficial effect, the results of the selected studies were inconsistent. Overall, the evidence that screening reduced mortality from prostate cancer was insufficient. Furthermore, prostate cancer screening is associated with serious harms, including overdiagnosis, adverse effects of needle biopsy and adverse effects of local prostatectomy. At present, the evidence for the effect of prostate cancer screening is insufficient. Both PSA and DRE were not recommended for population-based screening programs, but they could be conducted as individual-based screening if basic requirements were met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19346535     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyp025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals: use of record linkage from the Osaka Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Tami Sengoku; Kaname Matsumura; Masahisa Usami; Yoshimitsu Takahashi; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Impact of prostate-specific antigen screening on tumor size in patients with prostate cancer in a super-aging district in Kyoto, Japan.

Authors:  Toru Matsugasumi; Koji Okihara; Masashi Tsujimoto; Osamu Sato; Tetsuya Imura; Yasuhiro Yamada; Atsuko Fujihara; Takumi Shiraishi; Fumiya Hongo; Osamu Ukimura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Associations of body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption with prostate cancer mortality in the Asia Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Jay H Fowke; Dale F McLerran; Prakash C Gupta; Jiang He; Xiao-Ou Shu; Kunnambath Ramadas; Shoichiro Tsugane; Manami Inoue; Akiko Tamakoshi; Woon-Puay Koh; Yoshikazu Nishino; Ichiro Tsuji; Kotaro Ozasa; Jian-Min Yuan; Hideo Tanaka; Yoon-Ok Ahn; Chien-Jen Chen; Yumi Sugawara; Keun-Young Yoo; Habibul Ahsan; Wen-Harn Pan; Mangesh Pednekar; Dongfeng Gu; Yong-Bing Xiang; Catherine Sauvaget; Norie Sawada; Renwei Wang; Masako Kakizaki; Yasutake Tomata; Waka Ohishi; Lesley M Butler; Isao Oze; Dong-Hyun Kim; San-Lin You; Sue K Park; Faruque Parvez; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Yu Chen; Jung Eun Lee; Eric Grant; Betsy Rolland; Mark Thornquist; Ziding Feng; Wei Zheng; Paolo Boffetta; Rashmi Sinha; Daehee Kang; John D Potter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  Is prostate-specific antigen effective for population screening of prostate cancer? A systematic review.

Authors:  Yoon Jae Lee; Ji Eun Park; Byung Ryul Jeon; Sang Moo Lee; Soo Young Kim; You Kyoung Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Evaluation of prostate cancer prevalence in Iranian male population with increased PSA level, a one center experience.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi; Fariborz Lotfi; Seyed Ali Tahvildar
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Determinants of participation in prostate cancer screening: a simple analytical framework to account for healthy-user bias.

Authors:  Takahiro Tabuchi; Tomio Nakayama; Wakaba Fukushima; Ichiro Matsunaga; Satoko Ohfuji; Kyoko Kondo; Eiji Kawano; Hiroyuki Fukuhara; Yuri Ito; Akira Oshima
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Knowledge and attitude of the population toward cancer prostate Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mostafa A Arafa; Karim H Farhat; Danny M Rabah
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  Discoveries and application of prostate-specific antigen, and some proposals to optimize prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Shinkan Tokudome; Ryosuke Ando; Yoshiro Koda
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Significance of PSA Screening in Niigata, Japan: Survey of Actual Status of New Cases of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Toshihiro Saito; Shuichi Komatsubara; Noboru Hara; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Akiyoshi Katagiri; Fumio Ishizaki; Akihiko Hatano; Takeshi Komeyama; Shugo Hanyu; Masahiro Terunuma; Tomoyuki Imai; Hideto Go; Hiroaki Iida; Shigenori Kurumada; Shunsuke Yamaguchi; Keisuke Takeda; Takashi Ando; Tatsuhiko Hoshii; Takashi Kasahara; Yoshihiko Tomita
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-12-24

10.  Re: Determinants of participation in prostate cancer screening: A simple analytical framework to account for healthy-user bias.

Authors:  Shinkan Tokudome
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.716

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.