P Sinha1, N J Fauvel, S Singh, N Soni. 1. Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK. p.sinha@imperial.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measures of oxygenation are traditionally used to monitor the progress of patients on positive pressure ventilation. Although CO2 elimination depends on fewer variables, measures of CO2 elimination are comparatively overlooked except when monitoring patients who are difficult to ventilate. CO2 elimination is dependent upon CO2 production and alveolar ventilation, which together determine Pa(CO2). Alveolar ventilation is the efficient portion of minute ventilation ('E'). In the clinical setting, problems with CO2 elimination are observed as increasing Pa(CO2), increasing minute ventilation, or both. In conventional tests of respiratory function, actual measurements are frequently compared with predicted measurements. However, this approach has rarely been applied to the measurement of ventilatory efficiency. METHODS: We have developed a ratio, called the ventilatory ratio (VR), which compares actual measurements and predicted values of minute ventilation and Pa(CO2). VR = (V(E measured) x Pa(CO2 measured))/(V(E predicted) x Pa(CO2 predicted)). V(E predicted) is taken to be 100 (ml kg(-1) min(-1)) based on predicted body weight, and Pa(CO2 predicted)) is taken to be 5 kPa. RESULTS: Inspection shows VR to be a unitless ratio that can be easily calculated at the bedside. VR is governed by carbon dioxide production and ventilatory efficiency in a logically intuitive way. We suggest that VR provides a simple guide to changes in ventilatory efficiency. A value close to 1 is predicted for normal individuals and an increasing value would correspond with worsening ventilation, increased CO2 production, or both. CONCLUSIONS: VR is a new tool providing additional information for clinicians managing ventilated patients.
BACKGROUND: Measures of oxygenation are traditionally used to monitor the progress of patients on positive pressure ventilation. Although CO2 elimination depends on fewer variables, measures of CO2 elimination are comparatively overlooked except when monitoring patients who are difficult to ventilate. CO2 elimination is dependent upon CO2 production and alveolar ventilation, which together determine Pa(CO2). Alveolar ventilation is the efficient portion of minute ventilation ('E'). In the clinical setting, problems with CO2 elimination are observed as increasing Pa(CO2), increasing minute ventilation, or both. In conventional tests of respiratory function, actual measurements are frequently compared with predicted measurements. However, this approach has rarely been applied to the measurement of ventilatory efficiency. METHODS: We have developed a ratio, called the ventilatory ratio (VR), which compares actual measurements and predicted values of minute ventilation and Pa(CO2). VR = (V(E measured) x Pa(CO2 measured))/(V(E predicted) x Pa(CO2 predicted)). V(E predicted) is taken to be 100 (ml kg(-1) min(-1)) based on predicted body weight, and Pa(CO2 predicted)) is taken to be 5 kPa. RESULTS: Inspection shows VR to be a unitless ratio that can be easily calculated at the bedside. VR is governed by carbon dioxide production and ventilatory efficiency in a logically intuitive way. We suggest that VR provides a simple guide to changes in ventilatory efficiency. A value close to 1 is predicted for normal individuals and an increasing value would correspond with worsening ventilation, increased CO2 production, or both. CONCLUSIONS: VR is a new tool providing additional information for clinicians managing ventilated patients.
Authors: Maria Plataki; Di Pan; Parag Goyal; Katherine Hoffman; Jacky Man Kwan Choi; Hao Huang; Monika M Safford; Edward J Schenck Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2021-08
Authors: Pratik Sinha; Carolyn S Calfee; Jeremy R Beitler; Neil Soni; Kelly Ho; Michael A Matthay; Richard H Kallet Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: David R Ziehr; Jehan Alladina; Camille R Petri; Jason H Maley; Ari Moskowitz; Benjamin D Medoff; Kathryn A Hibbert; B Taylor Thompson; C Corey Hardin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Edward J Schenck; Katherine Hoffman; Parag Goyal; Justin Choi; Lisa Torres; Kapil Rajwani; Christopher W Tam; Natalia Ivascu; Fernando J Martinez; David A Berlin Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-09
Authors: Francesco Vasques; Barnaby Sanderson; Federico Formenti; Manu Shankar-Hari; Luigi Camporota Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 17.440