BACKGROUND: The natural history and the mechanisms behind the alteration of vaginal distension (VD) in a mouse model are not clear. OBJECTIVE: We examined the temporal sequelae of VD and pudendal nerve transection (PNT) on leak-point pressure (LPP) and the muscular and nerve components of the urethra in mice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two virgin female C57BL/6 mice were equally distributed into three groups. The VD group underwent VD for 1h. The PNT group received bilateral PNT. A control group underwent sham VD. INTERVENTION: Each group was divided into four subgroups of six mice for measurement of LPP at 0, 4, 10, and 20 d after VD or PNT. MEASUREMENTS: LPP was measured. Morphology and neurofilament-immunoreactive nerve of the urethra were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: LPP was decreased at 0, 4, and 10 d but not at 20 d after VD. Decreased LPP persisted to 20 d in the PNT group. The external urethral striated muscle appeared disrupted and/or wavy in two mice at 0 d, in three mice at 4 d, in one mouse at 10 d, and in one mouse in 20 d after VD. The density of neurofilament-immunoreactive nerve in the urethra was reduced at 4 and 10 d after VD, but not at 20 d, and at 4, 10, and 20 d after PNT compared with the corresponding values of the sham VD group. The limitation of this animal model is that the pelvic floor structure of the mouse is different from that of female humans. Therefore, results of this study should be carefully applied to human subjects. CONCLUSIONS: VD causes reversible stress urinary incontinence in female mice. Recovery of continence function following VD is associated with repair of the external urethral sphincter and reinnervation of the urethra. This mouse model will be useful for mechanistic investigation and targeting of therapeutic intervention by taking advantage of genetic manipulation. 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The natural history and the mechanisms behind the alteration of vaginal distension (VD) in a mouse model are not clear. OBJECTIVE: We examined the temporal sequelae of VD and pudendal nerve transection (PNT) on leak-point pressure (LPP) and the muscular and nerve components of the urethra in mice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two virgin female C57BL/6 mice were equally distributed into three groups. The VD group underwent VD for 1h. The PNT group received bilateral PNT. A control group underwent sham VD. INTERVENTION: Each group was divided into four subgroups of six mice for measurement of LPP at 0, 4, 10, and 20 d after VD or PNT. MEASUREMENTS: LPP was measured. Morphology and neurofilament-immunoreactive nerve of the urethra were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: LPP was decreased at 0, 4, and 10 d but not at 20 d after VD. Decreased LPP persisted to 20 d in the PNT group. The external urethral striated muscle appeared disrupted and/or wavy in two mice at 0 d, in three mice at 4 d, in one mouse at 10 d, and in one mouse in 20 d after VD. The density of neurofilament-immunoreactive nerve in the urethra was reduced at 4 and 10 d after VD, but not at 20 d, and at 4, 10, and 20 d after PNT compared with the corresponding values of the sham VD group. The limitation of this animal model is that the pelvic floor structure of the mouse is different from that of female humans. Therefore, results of this study should be carefully applied to human subjects. CONCLUSIONS: VD causes reversible stress urinary incontinence in female mice. Recovery of continence function following VD is associated with repair of the external urethral sphincter and reinnervation of the urethra. This mouse model will be useful for mechanistic investigation and targeting of therapeutic intervention by taking advantage of genetic manipulation. 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Izumi Kamo; Kazumasa Torimoto; Michael B Chancellor; William C de Groat; Naoki Yoshimura Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: K Sakuma; K Watanabe; M Sano; I Uramoto; H Nakano; Y J Li; S Kaneda; Y Sorimachi; K Yoshimoto; M Yasuhara; T Totsuka Journal: Brain Res Date: 2001-07-13 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: R H Gelberman; R M Szabo; R V Williamson; A R Hargens; N C Yaru; M A Minteer-Convery Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1983-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kathryn L Burgio; Halina Zyczynski; Julie L Locher; Holly E Richter; David T Redden; Kate Clark Wright Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Shengmei Zhou; Lan S Chen; Yasushi Miyauchi; Mizuho Miyauchi; Saibal Kar; Simon Kangavari; Michael C Fishbein; Behrooz Sharifi; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Circ Res Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Rachelle Prantil-Baun; William C de Groat; Minoru Miyazato; Michael B Chancellor; Naoki Yoshimura; David A Vorp Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2010-05-05
Authors: Adonis K Hijaz; Kerry O Grimberg; Mingfang Tao; Brian Schmotzer; Zhina Sadeghi; Yi-Hao Lin; Michael Kavran; Ahmet Ozer; Nan Xiao; Firouz Daneshgari Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.091