RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Task-evoked functional MRI (fMRI) has been used successfully in the study of brain function and clinically for presurgical localization of eloquent brain regions prior to the performance of brain surgery. This method requires patient cooperation and is not useful in young children or if the patient has cognitive dysfunction or physical impairment. An alternative method that can overcome some of these disadvantages measures the intrinsic function of the brain using resting-state fMRI. This method does not require any task performance and measures the spontaneous low-frequency (<0.1 Hz) fluctuations of the fMRI signal over time. Our objective in the present work is to provide preliminary information on the possible clinical utility of this technique for presurgical planning and on possible future applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from prior fMRI resting-state studies were reviewed for their potential use in preoperative mapping. Structural and resting-state fMRI data from normal subjects and patients with brain tumors were preprocessed and seed regions were placed in key regions of the brain; the related functional networks were identified using correlation analysis. RESULTS: Several key functional networks can be identified in patients with brain tumors from resting-state fMRI data. CONCLUSION: Resting-state fMRI data can provide valuable presurgical information in many patients who cannot benefit from traditional task-based fMRI. Adoption of this method has the potential to improve individualized patient-centered care.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Task-evoked functional MRI (fMRI) has been used successfully in the study of brain function and clinically for presurgical localization of eloquent brain regions prior to the performance of brain surgery. This method requires patient cooperation and is not useful in young children or if the patient has cognitive dysfunction or physical impairment. An alternative method that can overcome some of these disadvantages measures the intrinsic function of the brain using resting-state fMRI. This method does not require any task performance and measures the spontaneous low-frequency (<0.1 Hz) fluctuations of the fMRI signal over time. Our objective in the present work is to provide preliminary information on the possible clinical utility of this technique for presurgical planning and on possible future applications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from prior fMRI resting-state studies were reviewed for their potential use in preoperative mapping. Structural and resting-state fMRI data from normal subjects and patients with brain tumors were preprocessed and seed regions were placed in key regions of the brain; the related functional networks were identified using correlation analysis. RESULTS: Several key functional networks can be identified in patients with brain tumors from resting-state fMRI data. CONCLUSION: Resting-state fMRI data can provide valuable presurgical information in many patients who cannot benefit from traditional task-based fMRI. Adoption of this method has the potential to improve individualized patient-centered care.
Authors: Justin L Vincent; Abraham Z Snyder; Michael D Fox; Benjamin J Shannon; Jessica R Andrews; Marcus E Raichle; Randy L Buckner Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2006-08-09 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Masaki Fukunaga; Silvina G Horovitz; Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; J Martijn Jansma; Vasiliki N Ikonomidou; Renxin Chu; Roel H R Deckers; David A Leopold; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: James M Johnston; S Neil Vaishnavi; Matthew D Smyth; Dongyang Zhang; Biyu J He; John M Zempel; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Dongyang Zhang; James M Johnston; Michael D Fox; Eric C Leuthardt; Robert L Grubb; Michael R Chicoine; Matthew D Smyth; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Joshua S Shimony Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: J L Vincent; G H Patel; M D Fox; A Z Snyder; J T Baker; D C Van Essen; J M Zempel; L H Snyder; M Corbetta; M E Raichle Journal: Nature Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Haris I Sair; Noushin Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi; Vince D Calhoun; Raag D Airan; Shruti Agarwal; Jarunee Intrapiromkul; Ann S Choe; Sachin K Gujar; Brian Caffo; Martin A Lindquist; Jay J Pillai Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Shruti Agarwal; Haris I Sair; Raag Airan; Jun Hua; Craig K Jones; Hye-Young Heo; Alessandro Olivi; Martin A Lindquist; James J Pekar; Jay J Pillai Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Erika Proal; Mar Alvarez-Segura; María de la Iglesia-Vayá; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; F Xavier Castellanos Journal: Rev Neurol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 0.870
Authors: Koene R A Van Dijk; Trey Hedden; Archana Venkataraman; Karleyton C Evans; Sara W Lazar; Randy L Buckner Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.714