PURPOSE: The proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a clinically useful motion-preserving procedure for various arthritides of the wrist. However, there are few studies on the "contact biomechanics" after PRC. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contact biomechanics in terms of pressure, area, and contact location of the intact and PRC wrist. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaver forearms were tested in neutral, 45 degrees of flexion, and 45 degrees of extension. In the intact wrist, Fuji UltraSuperLow pressure contact film was placed in the radioulnocarpal joint. The specimen was loaded to a total force of 200 N. We then performed a PRC, and the experiment was repeated using Fuji Low film. The film was scanned and analyzed with a customized MATLAB program. Multivariable analysis of variance with multiple contrast testing and Student's t-test were performed for statistics. RESULTS: In the intact wrist, scaphoid contact pressure averaged 1.4 megapascals (MPa), and lunate contact pressure averaged 1.3 MPa. In terms of contact location, scaphoid contact in the intact wrist significantly moved dorsal and ulnar in flexion and significantly moved volar and radial in extension. Lunate contact significantly moved dorsal in flexion. PRC wrist contact pressure was 3.8 times that of the intact wrist, and the contact area was approximately 26% that of the intact wrist. Lastly, in terms of the amount of contact translation after PRC, the capitate contact translated (7.5 mm) more than did the scaphoid contact (5.6 mm) and had about equal translation to that of the lunate (7.3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Contact pressure increased significantly and contact area decreased significantly after PRC. There is significant contact translation after PRC (more than scaphoid translation but equal to lunate translation), which provides quantitative support of the theory that translational motion of the PRC may explain its good clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE: The proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a clinically useful motion-preserving procedure for various arthritides of the wrist. However, there are few studies on the "contact biomechanics" after PRC. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contact biomechanics in terms of pressure, area, and contact location of the intact and PRC wrist. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaver forearms were tested in neutral, 45 degrees of flexion, and 45 degrees of extension. In the intact wrist, Fuji UltraSuperLow pressure contact film was placed in the radioulnocarpal joint. The specimen was loaded to a total force of 200 N. We then performed a PRC, and the experiment was repeated using Fuji Low film. The film was scanned and analyzed with a customized MATLAB program. Multivariable analysis of variance with multiple contrast testing and Student's t-test were performed for statistics. RESULTS: In the intact wrist, scaphoid contact pressure averaged 1.4 megapascals (MPa), and lunate contact pressure averaged 1.3 MPa. In terms of contact location, scaphoid contact in the intact wrist significantly moved dorsal and ulnar in flexion and significantly moved volar and radial in extension. Lunate contact significantly moved dorsal in flexion. PRC wrist contact pressure was 3.8 times that of the intact wrist, and the contact area was approximately 26% that of the intact wrist. Lastly, in terms of the amount of contact translation after PRC, the capitate contact translated (7.5 mm) more than did the scaphoid contact (5.6 mm) and had about equal translation to that of the lunate (7.3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Contact pressure increased significantly and contact area decreased significantly after PRC. There is significant contact translation after PRC (more than scaphoid translation but equal to lunate translation), which provides quantitative support of the theory that translational motion of the PRC may explain its good clinical outcomes.
Authors: Jörg Eschweiler; Jianzhang Li; Valentin Quack; Björn Rath; Alice Baroncini; Frank Hildebrand; Filippo Migliorini Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2022-01-27
Authors: Bardiya Akhbari; Amy M Morton; Kalpit N Shah; Janine Molino; Douglas C Moore; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Scott W Wolfe; Joseph J Crisco Journal: J Biomech Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 2.789