Literature DB >> 19345614

Lateral fluoroscopic guide to prevent occipitocervical and atlantoaxial joint violation during C1 lateral mass screw placement.

Jin S Yeom1, Jacob M Buchowski, Kun-Woo Park, Bong-Soon Chang, Choon-Ki Lee, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Inadvertent perforation of the C0-C1 and C1-C2 joints is one of the potential complications of C1 screw insertion.
PURPOSE: To identify a simple lateral fluoroscopic landmark to help prevent atlantooccipital (C0-C1) and atlantoaxial (C1-C2) joint violations during C1 lateral mass screw insertion. STUDY
DESIGN: Screw insertion simulation using computed tomography (CT). PATIENT SAMPLE: Cervical spine 1.0-mm interval CT scans of 154 patients performed at a single institution between October 2004 and October 2005 were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: C0-C1 and C1-C2 joint violations during CT-based simulation of C1 lateral mass screw placement.
METHODS: Fine cut CT scans and screw trajectory software was used to simulate insertion of 4.0mm screws. The entry point was the middle of the junction of the posterior arch and the posterior inferior part of the lateral mass. Zero and fifteen degrees medially angulated trajectories were evaluated. For both, we determined the maximum cranial and caudal angulation that avoided joint violation, and where the screw could safely be directed in the C1 anterior arch on a lateral view using these angulations. We expressed these targeting points as a percentage of the total height of the anterior atlas arch such that 100% represented the cranial border of the arch, 50% the center and 0% the caudal border.
RESULTS: Screw trajectories in 154 patients (308 screws) were evaluated. Using the 15 degrees medial angulation, the C0-C1 joint was safe in all cases when the trajectory was below the 40% point of the anterior arch. The C1-C2 joint was safe when the trajectory was above the 20% point. Using the 0 degrees angulation, safety margin was slightly wider. Because it may be difficult to differentiate between 0 degrees and 15 degrees of medial angulation intraoperatively, we suggest aiming the screw tip between the 20% and 40% points for either trajectory. We call this the "safe zone of C1."
CONCLUSIONS: When the screw is directed between 0 degrees and 15 degrees medially, it can be inserted without C0-C1 and C1-C2 joint violation if the screw tip trajectory lies between the 20% and 40% points of the anterior atlas arch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345614     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  3 in total

1.  The development and evaluation of individualized templates to assist transoral C2 articular mass or transpedicular screw placement in TARP-IV procedures: adult cadaver specimen study.

Authors:  Xue-Shi Li; Zeng-Hui Wu; Hong Xia; Xiang-Yang Ma; Fu-Zhi Ai; Kai Zhang; Jian-Hua Wang; Xiao-Hong Mai; Qing-Shui Yin
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  The Intersection Between Lateral Mass and Inferomedial Edge of the C1 Posterior Arch: A Reference Point for C1 Lateral Mass Screw Insertion.

Authors:  Torphong Bunmaprasert; Watcharapong Puangkaew; Nantawit Sugandhavesa; Wongthawat Liawrungrueang; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-06-30

3.  Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following O-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jacob D Smith; Megan M Jack; Nicholas R Harn; Judson R Bertsch; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.