Literature DB >> 19345522

Evaluation of alternative strategies to MERV 16-based air filtration systems for reduction of the risk of airborne spread of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Scott Dee1, Andrea Pitkin, John Deen.   

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a re-emerging disease of pigs and a growing threat to the global swine industry. For sustainable disease control it is critical to prevent the airborne spread of the etiologic agent, PRRS virus, between pig populations. The application of MERV 16-based air filtration systems to swine facilities in an effort to reduce this risk has been proposed; however, due to the cost and air flow restrictions of such systems the need for alternative strategies has arisen. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate 3 groups of alternative biosecurity strategies for reducing the risk of the airborne spread of PRRSV. Strategies evaluated included mechanical filters, antimicrobial filters and a disinfectant-EVAP (evaporative cooling) system. Results from this study indicate that while alternatives to MERV 16-based biosecurity protocols for protecting farms from the airborne spread of PRRSV are available, further information on their efficacy in the field is needed before conclusions can be drawn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345522     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the long-term effect of air filtration on the occurrence of new PRRSV infections in large breeding herds in swine-dense regions.

Authors:  Scott Dee; Jean Paul Cano; Gordon Spronk; Darwin Reicks; Paul Ruen; Andrea Pitkin; Dale Polson
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 2.  Biosecurity in pig farms: a review.

Authors:  Laura Valeria Alarcón; Alberto Allepuz; Enric Mateu
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-01-04

3.  Efficiency of different air filter types for pig facilities at laboratory scale.

Authors:  Cindy Wenke; Janina Pospiech; Tobias Reutter; Uwe Truyen; Stephanie Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.