Literature DB >> 19345515

Assessing the effect of a contouring protocol on postprostatectomy radiotherapy clinical target volumes and interphysician variation.

Darren M Mitchell1, Lesley Perry, Steve Smith, Tony Elliott, James P Wylie, Richard A Cowan, Jacqueline E Livsey, John P Logue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare postprostatectomy clinical target volume (CTV) delineation before and after the introduction of a contouring protocol and to investigate its effect on interphysician variability METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six site-specialized radiation oncologists independently delineated a CTV on the computed tomography (CT) scans of 3 patients who had received postprostatectomy radiotherapy. At least 3 weeks later this was repeated, but with the physicians adhering to the contouring protocol from the Medical Research Council's Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation In Combination After Local Surgery (RADICALS) trial. The volumes obtained before and after the protocol were compared and the effect of the protocol on interphysician variability assessed.
RESULTS: An increase in mean CTV for all patients of 40.7 to 53.9 cm(3) was noted as a result of observing the protocol, with individual increases in the mean CTV of 65%, 15%, and 24% for Patients 1, 2, and 3 respectively. A reduction in interphysician variability was noted when the protocol was used.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial interphysician variation in target volume delineation for postprostatectomy radiotherapy exists, which can be reduced by the use of a contouring protocol. The RADICALS contouring protocol increases the target volumes when compared with those volumes typically applied at our center. The effect of treating larger volumes on the therapeutic ratio and resultant toxicity should be carefully monitored, particularly if the same dose-response as documented in radical prostate radiotherapy applies to the adjuvant and salvage setting. Prostate cancer, Postprostatectomy, Radiotherapy, Target volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345515     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Interobserver variation in clinical target volume and organs at risk segmentation in post-parotidectomy radiotherapy: can segmentation protocols help?

Authors:  M Mukesh; R Benson; R Jena; A Hoole; T Roques; C Scrase; C Martin; G A Whitfield; J Gemmill; S Jefferies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Improving radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials: assessment of target volume delineation of the pre-accrual benchmark case.

Authors:  S Gwynne; E Spezi; D Sebag-Montefiore; S Mukherjee; E Miles; J Conibear; J Staffurth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Jasper Nijkamp; Joop C Duppen; Coen R N Rasch; Charles R Thomas; Samuel J Wang; Paul Okunieff; William E Jones; Daniel Baseman; Shilpen Patel; Carlo G N Demandante; Anna M Harris; Benjamin D Smith; Alan W Katz; Camille McGann; Jennifer L Harper; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Smalley; David T Marshall; Karyn A Goodman; Niko Papanikolaou; Lisa A Kachnic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Technology assessment of automated atlas based segmentation in prostate bed contouring.

Authors:  Jeremiah Hwee; Alexander V Louie; Stewart Gaede; Glenn Bauman; David D'Souza; Tracy Sexton; Michael Lock; Belal Ahmad; George Rodrigues
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Sophie Foxcroft; Tom McGowan; Eric Gutierrez; Michael Sharpe; Padraig Warde
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Maintaining prostate contouring consistency following an educational intervention.

Authors:  Luke Nicholls; Peter Gorayski; Michael Poulsen; Ashley W Plank; Karlissa Schick; Thuy Pham; Eric L H Khoo
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-03-16

7.  Comparison of Automated Atlas-Based Segmentation Software for Postoperative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Grégory Delpon; Alexandre Escande; Timothée Ruef; Julien Darréon; Jimmy Fontaine; Caroline Noblet; Stéphane Supiot; Thomas Lacornerie; David Pasquier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Delineation of the Prostate Bed: The "Invisible Target" Is Still an Issue?

Authors:  Igor Latorzeff; Paul Sargos; Geneviève Loos; Stéphane Supiot; Stéphane Guerif; Christian Carrie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Rationale and development of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy post-prostatectomy: the present standard of care?

Authors:  Julia R Murray; Helen A McNair; David P Dearnaley
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy - are they relevant and what can we do about them?

Authors:  Barbara Segedin; Primoz Petric
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.