Literature DB >> 19345291

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Klaus Engelke1, Cesar Libanati, Yu Liu, Huei Wang, Matt Austin, Tom Fuerst, Bernd Stampa, Wolfram Timm, Harry K Genant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows clinically relevant measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at central and appendicular skeletal sites, but DXA has a limited ability to assess bone geometry and cannot distinguish between the cortical and trabecular bone compartments. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can supplement DXA by enabling geometric and compartmental bone assessments. Whole-body spiral CT scanners are widely available and require only seconds per scan, in contrast to peripheral QCT scanners, which have restricted availability, limited spatial resolution, and require several minutes of scanning time. This study evaluated the accuracy and precision of whole-body spiral CT scanners for quantitatively assessing the distal radius, a common site of non-vertebral osteoporosis-related fractures, and compared the CT-measured densitometric values with those obtained from dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 postmenopausal women with baseline lumbar spine BMD T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5 underwent left forearm QCT using whole-body spiral CT scanners twice, 1 month apart. QCT volumes of interest were defined and analyzed at 3 specific radial regions: the ultradistal region by using slices at 8, 9, and 10 mm proximal to the ulnar styloid tip; the distal region by a slice 20 mm proximal; and the middle region by a slice 40 mm proximal. BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), volume, and average cortical thickness and circumference were measured. We evaluated QCT accuracy and precision and also report correlations between QCT and DXA for BMD and BMC.
RESULTS: Overall accuracy and precision errors for BMD, BMC and volume were consistent with known skeletal QCT technology precision and were generally less than 3%. BMD and BMC assessed by QCT and DXA were correlated (r=0.55 to 0.80). DISCUSSION: Whole-body spiral CT scanners allow densitometric evaluations of the distal radius with good accuracy and very good precision. This original and convenient method provides a tool to further investigate cortical and trabecular bone variables in the peripheral skeleton in osteoporotic patients. These assessments, coupled with evaluation of the effects on cortical and trabecular bone measured in response to therapies for osteoporosis, may advance our understanding of the contributors to non-vertebral fracture occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345291     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  34 in total

1.  A correlation exists between subchondral bone mineral density of the distal radius and systemic bone mineral density.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Rhee; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Short-term in vivo precision of BMD and parameters of trabecular architecture at the distal forearm and tibia.

Authors:  K Engelke; B Stampa; W Timm; B Dardzinski; A E de Papp; H K Genant; T Fuerst
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  A comparison of conventional maximum intensity projection with a new depth-specific topographic mapping technique in the CT analysis of proximal tibial subchondral bone density.

Authors:  James D Johnston; Saija A Kontulainen; Bassam A Masri; David R Wilson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Assessment of the morpho-densitometric parameters of the lumbar pedicles in osteoporotic and control women undergoing routine abdominal MDCT examinations.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry of bone-Impact of sample preparation and measurement conditions.

Authors:  Anja Henss; Anne Hild; Marcus Rohnke; Sabine Wenisch; Juergen Janek
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.456

6.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Bone health in children and adolescents: the available imaging techniques.

Authors:  Stefano Stagi; Loredana Cavalli; Chiara Iurato; Salvatore Seminara; Maria Luisa Brandi; Maurizio de Martino
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-09

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Osteoporosis in children: pediatric and pediatric rheumatology perspective: a review.

Authors:  Yosef Uziel; Eyal Zifman; Philip J Hashkes
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.054

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.